Stephen J. Lanspa
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Oncology top 2%
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Henry T. LynchJane F. LynchPatrice WatsonThomas C. SmyrkPatrick M. LynchR. Jennifer CavalieriC. Richard BolandT. C. Smyrk
- Topics
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (25 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (13 papers)Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (8 papers)
- Journals
- GastroenterologyHepatologyCancer
- Partner nations
- United StatesVietnamNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Stephen J. Lanspa
36 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.8k
- Oncology 1.4k
- Cancer Research 567
- Surgery 402
- Genetics 315
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Lanspa
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Lanspa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Lanspa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Lanspa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Lanspa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Lanspa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Lanspa. The network helps show where Stephen J. Lanspa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen J. Lanspa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen J. Lanspa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen J. Lanspa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen J. Lanspa. Stephen J. Lanspa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | Genetics, natural history, tumor spectrum, and pathology of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: An updated reviewbreakdown → | 792 |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 75 | |
| 14 | 112 | |
| 15 | 41 | |
| 16 | 78 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 41 | |
| 19 | 73 | |
| 20 | 101 |
About Stephen J. Lanspa
Stephen J. Lanspa is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology and Gastroenterology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (25 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (13 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.8k citations), Oncology (1.4k citations) and Cancer Research (567 citations). Stephen J. Lanspa has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Henry T. Lynch, Jane F. Lynch, Patrice Watson, Thomas C. Smyrk, Patrick M. Lynch, R. Jennifer Cavalieri, C. Richard Boland, T. C. Smyrk, Robert W. Beart and Joseph Marcus. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.