Stephen J. Chaplin
Impact in
-
- Plant and animal studies
- Hemiptera Insect Studies
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Plant and animal studies 6
- Hemiptera Insect Studies 3
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 5
- Co-authors
- John M. Pleasants (1 shared paper)Richard B. Root (1 shared paper)Susan B. Chaplin (2 shared papers)David Bergmann (1 shared paper)Stephen R. Shifley (1 shared paper)Alan J. Rebertus (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Oecologia (2 papers)Ecology (2 papers)Annals of the Entomological Society of America (1 paper)Journal of Animal Ecology (1 paper)Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesColombia
In The Last Decade
Stephen J. Chaplin
10 papers receiving 280 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 319
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 167
- Insect Science 105
- Plant Science 178
- Genetics 58
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Chaplin
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Chaplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Chaplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Chaplin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Chaplin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Chaplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Chaplin. The network helps show where Stephen J. Chaplin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Stephen J. Chaplin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1983 | 140 | |
| 2 | 1982 | 83 | |
| 3 | 1976 | 53 | |
| 4 | 1982 | 31 | |
| 5 | 1981 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1973 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1980 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1981 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 10 | |
| 10 | Characteristics and dynamics of an upland Missouri old-growth forest | 1995 | 8 |
| 11 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 12 | Conservation planning within the Great Plains | 1995 | 1 |
About Stephen J. Chaplin
Stephen J. Chaplin is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science, Ecology and Genetics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Hemiptera Insect Studies (3 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (319 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (167 citations), Insect Science (105 citations), Plant Science (178 citations) and Genetics (58 citations). Stephen J. Chaplin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include John M. Pleasants, Richard B. Root, Susan B. Chaplin, David Bergmann, Stephen R. Shifley and Alan J. Rebertus. Their work appears in journals such as Oecologia, Ecology, Annals of the Entomological Society of America, Journal of Animal Ecology and Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.