Stephen Ingram

694 citations
12 papers · 477 indexed · h-index 7

Stephen Ingram

10 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Stephen Ingram
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 83
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 303
  • Hardware and Architecture 45
  • Signal Processing 61
  • Biophysics 26
Replace E. Wes Bethel with:
E. Wes Bethel United States
C.T. Silva United States
Gwenaël Doërr France
R. H. Perrott United Kingdom
M.D. Swanson United States
Bettina Messmer Switzerland
Frank Hartung Germany
George M. Slota United States
Pei-Yu Lin Taiwan
Ali Al‐Haj Jordan
Stephen Ingram relative to E. Wes Bethel United States E. Wes Bethel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
E. Wes Bethel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Ingram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Ingram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Ingram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Ingram. The network helps show where Stephen Ingram may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Ingram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Ingram Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Ingram links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 20153
2 201479
3 201428
4 201453
5 201457
6 20131
7
High-Dimensional Data Analysis
20130
8
Glint: An MDS Framework for Costly Distance Functions
20121
9 201065
10 2008118
11 20082
12 200470

About Stephen Ingram

Stephen Ingram is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Hardware and Architecture, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Signal Processing and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 12 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (5 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (4 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (2 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (2 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (2 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (2 papers), Music and Audio Processing (1 paper) and Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (83 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (303 citations), Hardware and Architecture (45 citations), Signal Processing (61 citations) and Biophysics (26 citations). Stephen Ingram has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Tamara Munzner, Marc Olano, Matthew Brehmer, Pravin Bhat, Greg Turk, Andrew Warfield, Nicholas J. A. Harvey, Jonathan Stray, Michael Sedlmair and Melanie Tory. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Neurocomputing, DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics), Operating Systems Design and Implementation and Open Collections.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026