Jonathan Stray

671 total citations
11 papers, 251 citations indexed

About

Jonathan Stray is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Stray has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 251 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Stray's work include Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers) and Topic Modeling (2 papers). Jonathan Stray is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers) and Topic Modeling (2 papers). Jonathan Stray collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Jonathan Stray's co-authors include Stephen Ingram, Tamara Munzner, Matthew Brehmer, Richard McElreath, Joel Z. Leibo, Maxime Derex, Thomas L. Griffiths, Iyad Rahwan, Joseph Henrich and Ravi Iyer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Stray

9 papers receiving 235 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jonathan Stray United States	6	88	78	50	50	49	11	251
Jack Bandy United States	7	110 1.3×	71 0.9×	67 1.3×	13 0.3×	62 1.3×	15	238
Esin Durmus United States	10	45 0.5×	280 3.6×	20 0.4×	51 1.0×	40 0.8×	18	432
Samuel Carton United States	11	64 0.7×	225 2.9×	61 1.2×	16 0.3×	61 1.2×	15	351
Kaitlyn Zhou United States	9	100 1.1×	127 1.6×	64 1.3×	13 0.3×	16 0.3×	12	244
Christopher Rytting United States	4	86 1.0×	187 2.4×	27 0.5×	15 0.3×	45 0.9×	4	382
Aida Mostafazadeh Davani United States	10	165 1.9×	225 2.9×	44 0.9×	19 0.4×	34 0.7×	21	406
Li Lucy United States	7	50 0.6×	163 2.1×	15 0.3×	15 0.3×	29 0.6×	14	301
Robert Chesney United States	8	215 2.4×	132 1.7×	49 1.0×	133 2.7×	51 1.0×	35	493
Leo Leppänen Finland	10	47 0.5×	104 1.3×	48 1.0×	20 0.4×	13 0.3×	24	263
Sravana Reddy United States	11	24 0.3×	173 2.2×	24 0.5×	27 0.5×	35 0.7×	18	318

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Stray

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Stray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Stray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Stray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Stray

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Stray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Stray. The network helps show where Jonathan Stray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Stray

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Stray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Stray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Stray. Jonathan Stray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Stray, Jonathan, Bonnie L. Barrilleaux, Ravi Iyer, et al.. (2025). Ranking by engagement and non‐engagement signals: Learnings from industry. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1551(1). 19–32.

2.

Stray, Jonathan, et al.. (2025). Summon a demon and bind it: A grounded theory of LLM red teaming. PLoS ONE. 20(1). e0314658–e0314658.

3.

Baumann, Fabian, Jean‐François Bonnefon, Maxime Derex, et al.. (2023). Machine culture. Nature Human Behaviour. 7(11). 1855–1868. 42 indexed citations

4.

Stray, Jonathan. (2023). The AI Learns to Lie to Please You: Preventing Biased Feedback Loops in Machine-Assisted Intelligence Analysis. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(2). 350–358. 4 indexed citations

5.

Stray, Jonathan, et al.. (2023). The Algorithmic Management of Polarization and Violence on Social Media. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10 indexed citations

6.

Stray, Jonathan. (2022). Designing recommender systems to depolarize. First Monday. 10 indexed citations

7.

Stray, Jonathan. (2020). Aligning AI Optimization to Community Well-Being. PubMed. 3(4). 443–463. 29 indexed citations

8.

Aker, Ahmet, et al.. (2019). Third International Workshop on Recent Trends in News Information Retrieval (NewsIR'19). Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 1429–1431. 1 indexed citations

9.

Stray, Jonathan. (2019). Making Artificial Intelligence Work for Investigative Journalism. Digital Journalism. 7(8). 1076–1097. 94 indexed citations

10.

Stray, Jonathan. (2019). Institutional Counter-disinformation Strategies in a Networked Democracy. 1020–1025. 4 indexed citations

11.

Brehmer, Matthew, Stephen Ingram, Jonathan Stray, & Tamara Munzner. (2014). Overview: The Design, Adoption, and Analysis of a Visual Document Mining Tool for Investigative Journalists. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 20(12). 2271–2280. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact