Stephen H. Saul
- Insect Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science
- Genetics
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Susan D. McCombsMalcolm J. FraserAlfred M. HandlerGeorge B. CraigWallace C. MitchellPaul R. GrimstadS. Y. T. TamDonald O. McInnis
- Topics
- Insect behavior and control techniques (29 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (20 papers)Insect Resistance and Genetics (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
Stephen H. Saul
36 papers receiving 545 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Insect Science 414
- Molecular Biology 320
- Plant Science 116
- Genetics 100
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 86
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen H. Saul
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen H. Saul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen H. Saul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen H. Saul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen H. Saul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen H. Saul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen H. Saul. The network helps show where Stephen H. Saul may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen H. Saul
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen H. Saul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen H. Saul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen H. Saul. Stephen H. Saul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 208 | |
| 2 | 58 | |
| 3 | Genetics and Ecology of Colonization and Mass Rearing of Hawaiian Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) for Use in Sterile Insect Control Programs | 8 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Stephen H. Saul
Stephen H. Saul is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Parasitology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect behavior and control techniques (29 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (20 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (414 citations), Molecular Biology (320 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (86 citations). Stephen H. Saul has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Susan D. McCombs, Malcolm J. Fraser, Alfred M. Handler, George B. Craig, Wallace C. Mitchell, Paul R. Grimstad, S. Y. T. Tam, Donald O. McInnis, Tim T. Y. Wong and Yoram Rössler. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and The American Naturalist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.