Stephen Godfrey
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 0.2%
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies 91
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 65
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research 50
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena 15
- Particle Detector Development and Performance 8
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 7
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 10
- Condensed Matter Physics top 10%
-
- Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers 5
Stephen Godfrey
96 papers receiving 5.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 5.2k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 261
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 363
- Condensed Matter Physics 106
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 102
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Godfrey
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Godfrey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Godfrey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Godfrey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Godfrey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Godfrey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Godfrey. The network helps show where Stephen Godfrey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Godfrey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 27 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 70 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 7 | Nature of the Ds1* (2710) and DsJ* (2860) mesons | 2014 | 1 |
| 8 | Discovery and Identification of Extra Neutral Gauge Bosons at the LHC | 2009 | 4 |
| 9 | 2008 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 114 | |
| 12 | Discovery Potential for Doubly Charged Higgs Bosons in e + e − Collisions at LEP | 2002 | 11 |
| 13 | Discovery limits for Techni-$\\omega$ production in $e\\gamma$ Collisions | 1998 | 1 |
| 14 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 250 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1986 | 8 |
About Stephen Godfrey
Stephen Godfrey is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 99 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (91 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (65 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (50 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (15 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (10 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (8 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (7 papers) and Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (5.2k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (261 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (363 citations). Stephen Godfrey has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nathan Isgur, T. Barnes, Eric S. Swanson, Kenneth Moats, Richard J. Kokoski, S. L. Olsen, Jonathan L. Rosner, Jim Napolitano, Simon Capstick and Heinz König.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.