Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
"Naive" Quark-Pair-Creation Model of Strong-Interaction Vertices
1973478 citationsA. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver et al.Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fieldsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of L. Oliver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Oliver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Oliver more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Oliver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Oliver. The network helps show where L. Oliver may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. Oliver
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. Oliver.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. Oliver based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with L. Oliver. L. Oliver is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Oliver, L., et al.. (2017). The rural development policy in Mexico. Is there correspondence between the formal and the real. Economía UNAM.1 indexed citations
2.
Santoyo-Cortés, Vinicio Horacio, et al.. (2016). Strategy for strengthening sheep livestock production in Valle de Tulancingo, Hidalgo, México.. 9(5). 9–15.1 indexed citations
3.
Oliver, L.. (2016). Evolución del empleo y de la productividad en el sector agropecuario en México.
4.
Oliver, L.. (2009). Tres conceptos en conexión: animus, furtum y pro herede gestio.
Yaouanc, A. Le, L. Oliver, & J.‐C. Raynal. (2003). Sum rules in the heavy quark limit of QCD. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 67(11).18 indexed citations
7.
Charles, Jérôme, A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pène, & J.‐C. Raynal. (1998). Heavy-to-Light Form Factors in the Heavy Mass to Large Energy Limit of QCD. arXiv (Cornell University).46 indexed citations
Gavela, M.B., et al.. (1989). T-odd andCP-odd aplanarities ine+e−colliders. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 39(7). 1870–1876.32 indexed citations
12.
Yaouanc, A. Le, L. Oliver, J.‐C. Raynal, & O. Pène. (1988). Hadron transitions in the quark model. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).211 indexed citations
Yaouanc, A. Le, et al.. (1983). Critical coupling constants in chiral-symmetry breaking. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 28(6). 1530–1536.18 indexed citations
Yaouanc, A. Le, L. Oliver, O. Pène, & J.‐C. Raynal. (1975). Resonant partial-wave amplitudes in $pi$N $Yields$ $pi$$pi$N according to the naive quark-pair-creation model. Physical Review D.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.