Stephen G. Pyne

7.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
331 papers, 6.3k citations indexed

About

Stephen G. Pyne is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen G. Pyne has authored 331 papers receiving a total of 6.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 220 papers in Organic Chemistry, 119 papers in Molecular Biology and 57 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Stephen G. Pyne's work include Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (56 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (55 papers) and Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry (47 papers). Stephen G. Pyne is often cited by papers focused on Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (56 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (55 papers) and Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry (47 papers). Stephen G. Pyne collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Thailand and Canada. Stephen G. Pyne's co-authors include Paul A. Keller, Brian W. Skelton, E. J. Corey, Allan H. White, Thunwadee Ritthiwigrom, Alison T. Ung, Arife Yazici, John B. Bremner, Surat Laphookhieo and Anthony C. Willis and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

In The Last Decade

Stephen G. Pyne

324 papers receiving 6.1k citations

Hit Papers

Conversion of ketones having δ, ϵ-π-functions to cyclopen... 1983 2026 1997 2011 1983 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen G. Pyne Australia 40 4.3k 1.9k 777 733 529 331 6.3k
Vichai Reutrakul Thailand 45 3.0k 0.7× 2.3k 1.2× 1.3k 1.7× 830 1.1× 554 1.0× 298 7.0k
Pedro Joseph‐Nathan Mexico 33 2.4k 0.5× 2.4k 1.3× 1.2k 1.6× 429 0.6× 584 1.1× 452 5.9k
Ming‐Hua Yang China 37 2.0k 0.5× 1.9k 1.0× 752 1.0× 533 0.7× 942 1.8× 204 5.0k
Kenneth F. Bastow United States 49 3.4k 0.8× 3.5k 1.8× 1.0k 1.3× 470 0.6× 1.2k 2.3× 188 7.5k
Françoise Guéritte France 38 2.1k 0.5× 1.8k 0.9× 571 0.7× 762 1.0× 475 0.9× 138 4.3k
Ram A. Vishwakarma India 51 4.2k 1.0× 4.4k 2.3× 1.1k 1.5× 662 0.9× 1.3k 2.5× 364 10.5k
Mamoru Koketsu Japan 41 3.2k 0.8× 2.0k 1.1× 649 0.8× 183 0.2× 329 0.6× 305 6.2k
Atsushi Kato Japan 48 4.7k 1.1× 4.2k 2.2× 938 1.2× 485 0.7× 602 1.1× 315 8.2k
Susan L. Morris‐Natschke United States 49 3.5k 0.8× 5.0k 2.6× 1.3k 1.7× 1.2k 1.7× 1.4k 2.7× 265 9.7k
Peter J. Smith South Africa 40 2.7k 0.6× 1.3k 0.7× 627 0.8× 379 0.5× 286 0.5× 137 5.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen G. Pyne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen G. Pyne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen G. Pyne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen G. Pyne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen G. Pyne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen G. Pyne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen G. Pyne. The network helps show where Stephen G. Pyne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen G. Pyne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen G. Pyne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen G. Pyne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen G. Pyne. Stephen G. Pyne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Keller, Paul A., et al.. (2024). Current and Ongoing Developments in Targeting Clostridioides difficile Infection and Recurrence. Microorganisms. 12(6). 1206–1206. 2 indexed citations
2.
3.
Richardson, Christopher, et al.. (2023). Diastereoselective Petasis‐Borono‐Mannich Crotylation Reactions of Chiral α‐Heteroatom (F, OBz, OH) Aldehydes: Rapid Access to Valuable Mono and Bicyclic Heterocyclic Scaffolds. Chemistry - A European Journal. 29(53). e202301701–e202301701. 3 indexed citations
5.
Moggach, Stephen A., et al.. (2023). Nickel Phosphite-Catalyzed Tetradehydro-Diels–Alder Reactions of (E)-3-ene-1,8-diynes. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 88(9). 5391–5402. 3 indexed citations
6.
Pyne, Stephen G., et al.. (2023). The Chemical Synthesis of the 1-C-Alkyl Substituted Pyrrolidine and PiperidineIminosugar Natural Products and their Analogues. Current Organic Chemistry. 26(23). 2071–2097. 2 indexed citations
7.
Kato, Atsushi, et al.. (2023). Synthesis of the Purported Structure of Glyphaeaside C and Proposed Revisions to the Structures of the Glyphaeaside Alkaloids. Journal of Natural Products. 86(5). 1261–1273. 1 indexed citations
8.
Srikhanta, Yogitha N., M. Hutton, Chaille T. Webb, et al.. (2023). Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Cephamycin-Based Antisporulation Agents targeting Clostridioides difficile. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 67(1). 450–466. 4 indexed citations
9.
Laphookhieo, Surat, et al.. (2022). Flavonoids and xanthones from Maclura cochinchinensis (Lour.) Corner. and their antibacterial activity. Planta Medica. 88(15). 1471–1471.
10.
Putsathit, Papanin, et al.. (2021). Positional Isomers of Biphenyl Antimicrobial Peptidomimetic Amphiphiles. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 12(3). 413–419. 9 indexed citations
11.
Kato, Atsushi, et al.. (2021). Synthesis and Structural Revision of Glyphaeaside C. Organic Letters. 23(10). 4029–4033. 6 indexed citations
13.
Ingkaninan, Kornkanok, et al.. (2021). Oxidative biotransformation of stemofoline alkaloids. Artificial Cells Nanomedicine and Biotechnology. 49(1). 166–172. 4 indexed citations
14.
Putsathit, Papanin, Katherine A. Hammer, Steven M. Wales, et al.. (2019). Cationic biaryl 1,2,3-triazolyl peptidomimetic amphiphiles: synthesis, antibacterial evaluation and preliminary mechanism of action studies. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 168. 386–404. 29 indexed citations
15.
Zamani, Farzad, et al.. (2019). Divergent Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling of allenyloxazolidinones to give chiral 1,3-dienes and vinyloxazolidinones. Chemical Science. 10(39). 9051–9056. 20 indexed citations
16.
Phutdhawong, Weerachai, et al.. (2013). Stereoselective synthesis of α-methylenecyclopentenones via a Diels–Alder/retro-Diels–Alder protocol. Tetrahedron. 69(44). 9270–9276.
17.
Liawruangrath, Boonsom, et al.. (2012). Antioxidant and anticancer activities from aerial parts of Acalypha indica Linn. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 91(4). 157–58. 15 indexed citations
18.
Liawruangrath, Boonsom, et al.. (2011). Antimalarial, Anticancer, Antimicrobial activities and chemical constituents of essential oil from the aerial parts of Cyperus kyllingia Endl. Records of Natural Products. 5(4). 324–327. 19 indexed citations
19.
Pyne, Stephen G., et al.. (1997). Reactions of Lithiated N-Tosyl S-Phenyl S-2-Propenyl Sulfoximine with Aldehydes. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 20. 255–260. 2 indexed citations
20.
Hajipour, Abdol R. & Stephen G. Pyne. (1995). RELATIVE STEREOCHEMISTRY OF THE ADDUCTS FROM THE ADDITION OF LITHIATED METHYL PHENYL SULFOXIDE TO OXAZIRIDINES. Journal of Chemical Research Synopses. 360–361. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026