Stephen Fortescue
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- General Energy top 2%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Co-authors
- Douglas R. WeinerPhilip Hanson
- Topics
- Russia and Soviet political economy (9 papers)International Science and Diplomacy (6 papers)Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (5 papers)
- Cited by
- General EnergyPolitical Science and International RelationsGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomFinland
In The Last Decade
Stephen Fortescue
35 papers receiving 178 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Political Science and International Relations 138
- Sociology and Political Science 77
- Economics and Econometrics 49
- General Energy 47
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 38
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Fortescue
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Fortescue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Fortescue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Fortescue more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Fortescue
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Fortescue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Fortescue. The network helps show where Stephen Fortescue may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Fortescue
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Fortescue. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Fortescue based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Fortescue. Stephen Fortescue is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | Can Russia afford to be a great power | 1 |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | Business-State Negotiations and the Reform of Tax Procedures in Post-Yukos Russia | 2 |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | Ownership and corporate strategy in the Russian mining and metals sector | 2 |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | Project Planning in Soviet R&D : Research Policy | 1 |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Stephen Fortescue
Stephen Fortescue is a scholar working on General Energy, Fuel Technology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 220 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Russia and Soviet political economy (9 papers), International Science and Diplomacy (6 papers) and Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Energy (47 citations), Political Science and International Relations (138 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (38 citations). Stephen Fortescue has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Douglas R. Weiner and Philip Hanson. Their work appears in journals such as Research Policy, Climatic Change and Technovation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.