Stephen F. Sands

1.7k citations
29 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 17

Stephen F. Sands

28 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Stephen F. Sands
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 600
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 781
  • Developmental Biology 55
  • Statistics and Probability 165
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 171
Replace Peter Harzem with:
Peter Harzem United States
Roger K. Thomas United States
W. N. Schoenfeld United States
H. M. Jenkins Canada
James A. Dinsmoor United States
Donald S. Blough United States
Norman Guttman United States
Allan M. Schrier United States
Jeffrey S. Katz United States
Ben A. Williams United States
Stephen F. Sands relative to Peter Harzem United States Peter Harzem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Peter Harzem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen F. Sands

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen F. Sands's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen F. Sands with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen F. Sands more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen F. Sands

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen F. Sands. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen F. Sands. The network helps show where Stephen F. Sands may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen F. Sands, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen F. Sands Line = papers co-authored together Stephen F. Sands links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201726
2 201212
3 200415
4 200416
5 199123
6 199073
7 1988177
8 198440
9 19849
10
Monkey memory: same/different concept learning, serial probe acquisition, and probe delay effects.
198476
11 19834
12 198258
13 198246
14 19808
15 1980139
16 1980109
17 198025
18 19799
19 19795
20
PRIMATE MEMORY: PROBE RECOGNITION PERFORMANCE BY A RHESUS MONKEY
19791

About Stephen F. Sands

Stephen F. Sands is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Small Animals and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (600 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (781 citations) and Developmental Biology (55 citations). Stephen F. Sands has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anthony A. Wright, Robert G. Cook, Héctor C. Santiago, Donald F. Kendrick, Juan D. Delius, Jacquelyne J. Rivera, Paul G. Nestor, Robert W. McCarley, Steven F. Faux and Martha E. Shenton. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026