Stephen E. Chick

5.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
114 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

Stephen E. Chick is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen E. Chick has authored 114 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 29 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 26 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Stephen E. Chick's work include Simulation Techniques and Applications (44 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (20 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (15 papers). Stephen E. Chick is often cited by papers focused on Simulation Techniques and Applications (44 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (20 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (15 papers). Stephen E. Chick collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Stephen E. Chick's co-authors include K. Inoue, Chun‐Hung Chen, Enver Yücesan, Jianwu Lin, Alan Brennan, Ruth Davies, Christian Schmidt, Jürgen Branke, Hamed Mamani and David Simchi‐Levi and has published in prestigious journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Management Science and Biometrics.

In The Last Decade

Stephen E. Chick

105 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Hit Papers

Simulation Budget Allocat... 2000 2026 2008 2017 2000 100 200 300 400 500

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Stephen E. Chick 2.0k 718 678 519 503 114 3.6k
David Goldsman 2.0k 1.0× 469 0.7× 783 1.2× 413 0.8× 150 0.3× 187 3.3k
Sheldon H. Jacobson 991 0.5× 354 0.5× 342 0.5× 838 1.6× 682 1.4× 222 4.4k
L. Jeff Hong 1.5k 0.7× 543 0.8× 400 0.6× 263 0.5× 136 0.3× 103 2.3k
Michael C. Fu 3.0k 1.5× 1.1k 1.6× 595 0.9× 1.4k 2.7× 302 0.6× 263 6.5k
Chun‐Hung Chen 2.3k 1.1× 1.1k 1.5× 568 0.8× 1.2k 2.3× 131 0.3× 211 4.1k
Shabbir Ahmed 2.4k 1.2× 591 0.8× 396 0.6× 1.3k 2.5× 352 0.7× 140 7.3k
Duan Li 2.4k 1.2× 1.2k 1.7× 315 0.5× 231 0.4× 1.0k 2.1× 300 7.0k
Lee W. Schruben 2.5k 1.2× 714 1.0× 562 0.8× 784 1.5× 82 0.2× 147 4.0k
Chelsea C. White 815 0.4× 331 0.5× 219 0.3× 685 1.3× 347 0.7× 135 4.0k
Robert G. Sargent 2.4k 1.2× 704 1.0× 326 0.5× 743 1.4× 212 0.4× 136 5.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Chick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Chick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Chick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Chick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Chick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Chick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Chick. The network helps show where Stephen E. Chick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen E. Chick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen E. Chick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen E. Chick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen E. Chick. Stephen E. Chick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Flight, Laura, Alan Brennan, Stephen E. Chick, et al.. (2025). Value-adaptive clinical trial designs for efficient delivery of publicly funded trials - a discussion of methods, case studies, opportunities and challenges. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 25(1). 153–153.
2.
Chick, Stephen E., et al.. (2018). Extending a bayesian decision-theoretic approach to value-based sequential clinical trial design. Winter Simulation Conference. 2459–2470. 1 indexed citations
3.
Yücesan, Enver, et al.. (2016). The impact of broadcasting on the spread of opinions in social media conversations. Winter Simulation Conference. 3476–3487. 1 indexed citations
4.
Gans, Noah, et al.. (2016). Proposal for fully sequential multiarm trials with correlated arms. Winter Simulation Conference. 3688–3689. 2 indexed citations
5.
Yücesan, Enver, et al.. (2015). An agent based model of spread of competing rumors through online interactions on social media. Winter Simulation Conference. 3088–3089. 5 indexed citations
6.
Chick, Stephen E., Arnd Huchzermeier, & Serguei Netessine. (2014). Europe's solution factories. Harvard business review. 92(4). 111–115. 9 indexed citations
7.
Frazier, Peter I., Jing Xie, & Stephen E. Chick. (2011). Value of information methods for pairwise sampling with correlations. Winter Simulation Conference. 3979–3991. 11 indexed citations
8.
Gans, Noah, et al.. (2010). Optimal employee retention when inferring unknown learning curves. Winter Simulation Conference. 1178–1188. 1 indexed citations
9.
Soorapanth, Sada & Stephen E. Chick. (2010). Cost-utility analysis of behavioral interventions for HIV-infected persons to reduce HIV transmission in the USA. Winter Simulation Conference. 2433–2443. 1 indexed citations
10.
Chick, Stephen E. & Peter I. Frazier. (2009). The conjunction of the knowledge gradient and the economic approach to simulation selection. Winter Simulation Conference. 528–539. 5 indexed citations
11.
Chick, Stephen E. & Noah Gans. (2008). Update on economic approach to simulation selection problems. Winter Simulation Conference. 297–304. 1 indexed citations
12.
Chick, Stephen E., Jürgen Branke, & Christian Schmidt. (2007). New greedy myopic and existing asymptotic sequential selection procedures: preliminary empirical results. Winter Simulation Conference. 289–296. 9 indexed citations
13.
Chick, Stephen E., et al.. (2007). The Opportunity Cost and OCBA Selection Procedures in Ordinal Optimization. 37(5). 951–961. 14 indexed citations
14.
Chick, Stephen E. & Noah Gans. (2006). Simulation selection problems: overview of an economic analysis. Winter Simulation Conference. 279–286. 2 indexed citations
15.
Chick, Stephen E.. (2004). Bayesian methods for discrete event simulation. Winter Simulation Conference. 1. 89–100. 9 indexed citations
16.
Chick, Stephen E.. (2004). Expected opportunity cost guarantees and indifference zone selection procedures. b37. 465–473. 5 indexed citations
17.
Chick, Stephen E.. (2003). Indifference zone selection procedures: expected opportunity cost guarantees and indifference zone selection procedures. Winter Simulation Conference. 465–473. 3 indexed citations
18.
Chick, Stephen E. & Szu Hui Ng. (2002). Simulation input analysis: joint criterion for factor identification and parameter estimation. Winter Simulation Conference. 400–406. 7 indexed citations
19.
Chick, Stephen E.. (2000). Bayesian methods: bayesian methods for simulation. Winter Simulation Conference. 109–118. 15 indexed citations
20.
Chick, Stephen E. & K. Inoue. (1998). Sequential allocations that reduce risk for multiple comparisons. Winter Simulation Conference. 1. 669–676. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026