Stephen D. Johnson
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Health top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Joseph B. TamneyAlexander HirschfieldKate BowersRonald S. BurtonBryan ByersRichard ZeckhauserStephen CoateLawrence H. Gerstein
- Topics
- Religion and Society Interactions (28 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (13 papers)Religion, Society, and Development (10 papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsAmerican Economic ReviewJournal of Public Economics
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Stephen D. Johnson
53 papers receiving 580 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Sociology and Political Science 546
- Health 163
- Political Science and International Relations 154
- Social Psychology 91
- Gender Studies 70
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. Johnson
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. Johnson. The network helps show where Stephen D. Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen D. Johnson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen D. Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen D. Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen D. Johnson. Stephen D. Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 45 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Consumption, Computation Mistakes, and Fiscal Policy | 10 |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Stephen D. Johnson
Stephen D. Johnson is a scholar working on Health, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 55 papers that have together received 749 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (28 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (13 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (163 citations), Sociology and Political Science (546 citations) and Gender Studies (70 citations). Stephen D. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Joseph B. Tamney, Alexander Hirschfield, Kate Bowers, Ronald S. Burton, Bryan Byers, Richard Zeckhauser, Stephen Coate, Lawrence H. Gerstein, William Samuelson and Laurence J. Kotlikoff. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Economic Review and Journal of Public Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.