Stephen D. Davis

10.2k total citations · 3 hit papers
98 papers, 7.9k citations indexed

About

Stephen D. Davis is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen D. Davis has authored 98 papers receiving a total of 7.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 42 papers in Plant Science and 27 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Stephen D. Davis's work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (38 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (21 papers) and Tree Root and Stability Studies (16 papers). Stephen D. Davis is often cited by papers focused on Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (38 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (21 papers) and Tree Root and Stability Studies (16 papers). Stephen D. Davis collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Spain. Stephen D. Davis's co-authors include Frank W. Ewers, John S. Sperry, Anna L. Jacobsen, R. Brandon Pratt, Uwe G. Hacke, William T. Pockman, Katherine A. McCulloh, V. H. Heywood, Alan Hamilton and Stephen C. Sillett and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Blood.

In The Last Decade

Stephen D. Davis

95 papers receiving 7.5k citations

Hit Papers

Trends in wood density and structure are linked to preven... 1995 2026 2005 2015 2001 2004 1995 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen D. Davis United States 40 5.2k 3.3k 3.1k 2.3k 1.2k 98 7.9k
Luis Gil Spain 53 3.3k 0.6× 3.9k 1.2× 3.7k 1.2× 1.6k 0.7× 1.6k 1.3× 275 9.5k
Marco Conedera Switzerland 47 3.6k 0.7× 1.6k 0.5× 1.4k 0.4× 2.5k 1.1× 653 0.5× 256 7.6k
Jorge Castro Spain 41 6.7k 1.3× 6.1k 1.8× 3.0k 1.0× 3.0k 1.3× 1.6k 1.3× 150 11.8k
Dietrich Hertel Germany 49 2.8k 0.5× 2.8k 0.9× 1.8k 0.6× 1.1k 0.5× 644 0.5× 128 6.9k
Sylvain Delzon France 65 10.5k 2.0× 6.0k 1.8× 5.7k 1.8× 5.3k 2.3× 1.8k 1.5× 206 14.7k
Sergio Rossi Canada 55 8.6k 1.7× 5.7k 1.7× 1.6k 0.5× 7.7k 3.3× 386 0.3× 244 10.3k
Kaoru Kitajima United States 47 3.7k 0.7× 5.4k 1.6× 3.6k 1.2× 676 0.3× 2.8k 2.3× 126 9.4k
Gregory J. Jordan Australia 50 3.0k 0.6× 3.1k 0.9× 3.1k 1.0× 1.4k 0.6× 4.0k 3.3× 224 9.2k
Miroslav Svoboda Czechia 42 3.8k 0.7× 3.3k 1.0× 1.0k 0.3× 1.5k 0.7× 874 0.7× 155 6.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. Davis. The network helps show where Stephen D. Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen D. Davis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen D. Davis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen D. Davis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen D. Davis. Stephen D. Davis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Davis, Stephen D., et al.. (2023). Plant communication across different environmental contexts suggests a role for stomata in volatile perception. Plant Cell & Environment. 46(7). 2017–2030. 15 indexed citations
2.
Trueba, Santiago, Ruihua Pan, Christine Scoffoni, et al.. (2019). Thresholds for leaf damage due to dehydration: declines of hydraulic function, stomatal conductance and cellular integrity precede those for photochemistry. New Phytologist. 223(1). 134–149. 144 indexed citations
3.
Pratt, R. Brandon, et al.. (2019). High‐resolution computed tomography reveals dynamics of desiccation and rehydration in fern petioles of a desiccation‐tolerant fern. New Phytologist. 224(1). 97–105. 22 indexed citations
4.
Davis, Stephen D., et al.. (2015). Comparative Foliar Water Uptake and Leaf Hydrophobicity among Eight Species of California Ferns. Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University). 1 indexed citations
5.
Perrault, David, et al.. (2013). Isolation of microsatellite markers in a chaparral species endemic to southern California, Ceanothus megacarpus (Rhamnaceae). Applications in Plant Sciences. 1(5). 3 indexed citations
6.
Jacobsen, Anna L., R. Brandon Pratt, Stephen D. Davis, & Frank W. Ewers. (2008). Comparative community physiology: nonconvergence in water relations among three semi‐arid shrub communities. New Phytologist. 180(1). 100–113. 90 indexed citations
7.
Jacobsen, Anna L., R. Brandon Pratt, Stephen D. Davis, & Frank W. Ewers. (2007). Cavitation resistance and seasonal hydraulics differ among three arid Californian plant communities. Plant Cell & Environment. 30(12). 1599–1609. 124 indexed citations
8.
Pratt, R. Brandon, et al.. (2005). Mechanisms for tolerating freeze–thaw stress of two evergreen chaparral species: Rhus ovata and Malosma laurina (Anacardiaceae). American Journal of Botany. 92(7). 1102–1113. 38 indexed citations
9.
Koch, George W., et al.. (2004). The limits to tree height. Nature. 428(6985). 851–854. 823 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Ewers, Frank W., et al.. (2003). Freeze/thaw stress in Ceanothus of southern California chaparral. Oecologia. 136(2). 213–219. 29 indexed citations
12.
Fidanza, Michael A., et al.. (2000). 013 Investigations of Curative and Peventive Control Strategies for Fairy Ring Disease in Turfgrass. HortScience. 35(3). 390B–390. 1 indexed citations
13.
Ewers, Frank W., et al.. (1995). The mechanism of water‐stress‐induced embolism in two species of chaparral shrubs. Plant Cell & Environment. 18(2). 189–196. 160 indexed citations
14.
Davis, Stephen D., et al.. (1988). Differential survival of chaparral seedlings during the first summer drought after wildfire. Oecologia. 76(2). 215–221. 102 indexed citations
15.
Davis, Stephen D., et al.. (1986). Responses of Adaxial and Abaxial Stomata of Normally Oriented and Inverted Leaves of Vicia faba L. to Light. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 82(2). 384–389. 26 indexed citations
16.
Davis, Stephen D. & Harold A. Mooney. (1986). Water use patterns of four co-occurring chaparral shrubs. Oecologia. 70(2). 172–177. 98 indexed citations
17.
Davis, Stephen D. & Harold A. Mooney. (1986). Tissue water relations of four co-occurring chaparral shrubs. Oecologia. 70(4). 527–535. 69 indexed citations
18.
Davis, Stephen D., et al.. (1986). Comparative physiology of burned and unburned Rhus laurina after chaparral wildfire. Oecologia. 71(1). 63–68. 74 indexed citations
19.
Davis, Stephen D. & Harold A. Mooney. (1985). Comparative water relations of adjacent california shrub and grassland communities. Oecologia. 66(4). 522–529. 71 indexed citations
20.
Davis, Stephen D.. (1973). Interpretation of In Vivo Tests of Susceptiltility to Antibiotics. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 128(5). 672–673. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026