Stephen C. Ainlay

715 citations
19 papers · 436 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen C. Ainlay

16 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Stephen C. Ainlay
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Health 150
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 20
  • Sociology and Political Science 196
  • Social Psychology 78
  • Clinical Psychology 79
Replace Gwendolyn T. Sorell with:
Gwendolyn T. Sorell United States
Mary E. Hunt United States
Carel B. Germain United States
Joseph A. Weber United States
William Madsen United States
Lyle E. Larson Canada
Patricia D. Rozée United States
Joan D. Atwood United States
Richard L. Ochberg United States
Herbert C. Covey United States
Stephen C. Ainlay relative to Gwendolyn T. Sorell United States Gwendolyn T. Sorell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gwendolyn T. Sorell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen C. Ainlay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen C. Ainlay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen C. Ainlay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen C. Ainlay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen C. Ainlay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen C. Ainlay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen C. Ainlay. The network helps show where Stephen C. Ainlay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Stephen C. Ainlay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen C. Ainlay Line = papers co-authored together Stephen C. Ainlay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 198798
2 198492
3 199265
4 198459
5 198651
6 198315
7 198814
8 198812
9 19907
10 19965
11 19885
12 19914
13 19934
14 19882
15 19962
16 19881
17 20240
18 20240
19 19860

About Stephen C. Ainlay

Stephen C. Ainlay is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Plant Science, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agriculture and Farm Safety (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (1 paper) and Canadian Identity and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (150 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (20 citations), Sociology and Political Science (196 citations), Social Psychology (78 citations) and Clinical Psychology (79 citations). Stephen C. Ainlay has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ninian Smart, Gaylene Becker, Lerita M. Coleman, Douglas R. Smith, Michael L. Radelet, Victoria Lynn Swigert, Royce Singleton, James Davison Hunter, Leo Driedger and Robert Siemens. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal of American History, Social Forces and Journal of Social Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact