Stephen Aston

28 papers receiving 439 citations

Peers

Stephen Aston
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 26
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 53
  • Emergency Medicine 66
  • Epidemiology 235
  • Infectious Diseases 95
Replace Filipe Froes with:
Filipe Froes Portugal
Olivera Djurić Italy
Leonardo A. Stroud United States
Heti Pisarev Estonia
Ricardo de Amorim Corrêa Brazil
Daniel Shirley United States
Maria Júlia Gonçalves de Mello Brazil
Rodrigo Vazquez Guillamet United States
Susanna Szpunar United States
Åsa Askim Norway
Stephen Aston relative to Filipe Froes Portugal Filipe Froes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Filipe Froes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Aston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Aston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Aston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Aston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Aston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Aston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Aston. The network helps show where Stephen Aston may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Aston, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Aston Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Aston links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201387
2 201754
3 202353
4 201950
5 202043
6 201725
7 202321
8 201718
9 201617
10 201816
11 202013
12 19966
13 20236
14 20145
15 20095
16 20243
17
PHASE I TRIAL OF A HIGHLY IMMUNOGENIC T-CELL VACCINE FOR HEPATITIS C VIRUS BASED ON NOVEL ADENOVIRAL VECTORS FROM RARE SEROTYPES
20093
18 20233
19 20163
20 20213

About Stephen Aston

Stephen Aston is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (8 papers), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (7 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (5 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (4 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers) and HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (26 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (53 citations), Emergency Medicine (66 citations), Epidemiology (235 citations) and Infectious Diseases (95 citations). Stephen Aston has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malawi and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen B. Gordon, Heather J. Zar, Shabir A. Madhi, Jamie Rylance, Robert S. Heyderman, Antonia Ho, Jane Mallewa, Dean Everett, Mulinda Nyirenda and Hannah Jary. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open Respiratory Research, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Transfusion, BMJ Open and PLoS Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact