Joseph M. Lewis
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Genetics
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Derek J. SloanRick StockNicholas FeaseyC.T. MiltonT. J. KlopfensteinJamie RylanceV.S. BalakrishnanTimothy B. Frigo
- Topics
- Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (10 papers)Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers)Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (8 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineNature CommunicationsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMalawi
In The Last Decade
Joseph M. Lewis
65 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Infectious Diseases 236
- Epidemiology 209
- Agronomy and Crop Science 203
- Genetics 138
- Animal Science and Zoology 129
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph M. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph M. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph M. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph M. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph M. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph M. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph M. Lewis. The network helps show where Joseph M. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph M. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph M. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph M. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph M. Lewis. Joseph M. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 121 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Joseph M. Lewis
Joseph M. Lewis is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Animal Science and Zoology and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (10 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers) and Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (48 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (203 citations) and Molecular Medicine (95 citations). Joseph M. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Malawi. Frequent co-authors include Derek J. Sloan, Rick Stock, Nicholas Feasey, C.T. Milton, T. J. Klopfenstein, Jamie Rylance, V.S. Balakrishnan, Timothy B. Frigo, Terry J. Klopfenstein and Louis Brenner. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Nature Communications and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.