Stephanie N. DeCross
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Nim TottenhamKatie A. McLaughlinTanja JovanovićDaphne J. HoltMaurizio FavaEmily A. BoekeAmy FarabaughBenjamin G. Shapero
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers)
- Journals
- NeuroImageBiological PsychiatryJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyCanada
In The Last Decade
Stephanie N. DeCross
10 papers receiving 322 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Clinical Psychology 195
- Cognitive Neuroscience 85
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81
- Psychiatry and Mental health 71
- Social Psychology 60
Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie N. DeCross
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie N. DeCross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie N. DeCross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie N. DeCross more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie N. DeCross
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie N. DeCross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie N. DeCross. The network helps show where Stephanie N. DeCross may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie N. DeCross
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie N. DeCross. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie N. DeCross based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie N. DeCross. Stephanie N. DeCross is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 110 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 75 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 45 |
About Stephanie N. DeCross
Stephanie N. DeCross is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (35 citations), Clinical Psychology (195 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81 citations). Stephanie N. DeCross has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Nim Tottenham, Katie A. McLaughlin, Tanja Jovanović, Daphne J. Holt, Maurizio Fava, Emily A. Boeke, Amy Farabaugh, Benjamin G. Shapero, Joey C. Cheung and Garth Coombs. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Biological Psychiatry and Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.