Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 2%
- Co-authors
- Ann E. KelleyMatthew R. HolahanSarah M. NewmanNed H. KalinVaishali P. BakshiKristine L. WittWilliam K. KaufmannDimitri E. Grigoriadis
- Topics
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (17 papers)DNA Repair Mechanisms (12 papers)CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (6 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNucleic Acids ResearchJournal of Biological Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe
38 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Molecular Biology 671
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 545
- Cognitive Neuroscience 371
- Cancer Research 247
- Behavioral Neuroscience 220
Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe. The network helps show where Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe. Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 86 | |
| 12 | 48 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 50 | |
| 16 | 92 | |
| 17 | 71 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe
Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Behavioral Neuroscience and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (17 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (12 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (220 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (545 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (71 citations). Stephanie L. Smith‐Roe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ann E. Kelley, Matthew R. Holahan, Sarah M. Newman, Ned H. Kalin, Vaishali P. Bakshi, Kristine L. Witt, William K. Kaufmann, Dimitri E. Grigoriadis, Kenneth Sadeghian and Michael G. Kemp. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nucleic Acids Research and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.