Michel Vignes

3.5k citations
76 papers · 2.9k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Michel Vignes

74 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Michel Vignes
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Biological Psychiatry 238
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.7k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 160
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 140
  • Neurology 303
Replace Frédéric Knoflach with:
Frédéric Knoflach Switzerland
Thomas H. Lanthorn United States
Zhifang Dong China
Hiroyuki Watanabe Japan
Vincent Mutel Switzerland
Marc Marien France
Lori L. McMahon United States
Tony Priestley United States
John Q. Wang United States
A. Linden Finland
Michel Vignes relative to Frédéric Knoflach Switzerland Frédéric Knoflach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Frédéric Knoflach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michel Vignes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michel Vignes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michel Vignes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michel Vignes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michel Vignes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michel Vignes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michel Vignes. The network helps show where Michel Vignes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michel Vignes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michel Vignes Line = papers co-authored together Michel Vignes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997361
2 1996340
3 1999266
4 2006132
5 1998126
6 2007119
7 2008109
8 2011100
9 201099
10 201586
11 201379
12 199164
13 200563
14 199560
15 201358
16 199754
17 201147
18 200343
19 201139
20 201038

About Michel Vignes

Michel Vignes is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Insect Science, having authored 76 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (38 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (17 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (8 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (8 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (7 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (6 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (238 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.7k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (160 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (140 citations) and Neurology (303 citations). Michel Vignes has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Graham L. Collingridge, Janique Guiramand, Fabien Lanté, Catherine Cohen‐Solal, Max Récasens, Jeremy M. Henley, Kumlesh K. Dev, Ramesh Chittajallu, Janine M. Barnes and Marie‐Céleste de Jesus Ferreira. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropharmacology, Free Radical Biology and Medicine, Nature, European Journal of Neuroscience and Membranes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact