Stephanie Kane
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Epidemiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Anthropology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Blaise RaveloBlaise NsomFabrice DuvalMark WilliamsJan ZalasiewiczNeil S. DaviesIlaria MazziniJean‐Philippe Goiran
- Topics
- Law in Society and Culture (5 papers)Sex work and related issues (5 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephanie Kane
30 papers receiving 407 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Sociology and Political Science 213
- General Health Professions 81
- Epidemiology 72
- Biomedical Engineering 61
- Anthropology 60
Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Kane
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Kane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Kane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Kane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Kane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Kane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Kane. The network helps show where Stephanie Kane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Kane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Kane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Kane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Kane. Stephanie Kane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Infrastructural Drift in Seismic Cities: Chile, Pacific Rim, 27 February, 2010 | 2 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 71 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | Crime's power : anthropologists and the ethnography of crime | 26 |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 73 | |
| 16 | AIDS Alibis: Sex, Drugs, and Crime in the Americas | 14 |
| 17 | Perspectives: What Is Myth? | 1 |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Stephanie Kane
Stephanie Kane is a scholar working on Law, Anthropology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law in Society and Culture (5 papers), Sex work and related issues (5 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (60 citations), Sociology and Political Science (213 citations) and Urban Studies (24 citations). Stephanie Kane has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Blaise Ravelo, Blaise Nsom, Fabrice Duval, Mark Williams, Jan Zalasiewicz, Neil S. Davies, Ilaria Mazzini, Jean‐Philippe Goiran, Eden Medina and Scott M. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Annual Review of Anthropology and The Journal of Sex Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.