Stephanie Hyde

1.2k citations
19 papers · 750 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Stephanie Hyde

19 papers receiving 710 citations

Peers

Stephanie Hyde
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Genetics 129
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 117
  • Neurology 117
  • Rehabilitation 51
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 121
Replace E.L. van der Kooi with:
E.L. van der Kooi Netherlands
Ronald K. Reeves United States
John D. Hsu United States
S. Pandya United States
C W Hess Switzerland
Frank Petito United States
Anna Mayhew United Kingdom
André Truffert Switzerland
Lindsay E. Janes United States
V. Decostre France
Stephanie Hyde relative to E.L. van der Kooi Netherlands E.L. van der Kooi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
E.L. van der Kooi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Hyde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Hyde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Hyde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Hyde more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Hyde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Hyde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Hyde. The network helps show where Stephanie Hyde may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephanie Hyde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephanie Hyde Line = papers co-authored together Stephanie Hyde links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20202
3 202013
4 20193
5 20191
6 20187
7 20187
8 201512
9 199230
10 199049
11 1989107
12 198820
13 19876
14 198648
15 198552
16 1982245
17
Effect of exercise in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
198161
18
Prevention of deformity in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. A prospective study of passive stretching and splintage.
198147
19
Methods of measuring muscle strength and fatigue.
197739

About Stephanie Hyde

Stephanie Hyde is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pharmacology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 750 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle Physiology and Disorders (6 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (6 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (4 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (2 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (2 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers) and Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (129 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (117 citations), Neurology (117 citations), Rehabilitation (51 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (121 citations). Stephanie Hyde has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Victor Dubowitz, Oona M. Scott, C. Goddard, Gerta Vrbovà, J Z Heckmatt, Nathan Hasson, A. M. Peters, Geraldine Cambridge, Steven K. Dobscha and Benjamin J. Morasco. Their work appears in journals such as Muscle & Nerve, Journal of Opioid Management, Journal of Pain, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Clinical Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026