Journal of Opioid Management

822 papers and 9.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 822 papers published in Journal of Opioid Management in the last decades have received a total of 9.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Opioid Management usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (460 papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (410 papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (183 papers) specifically the topics of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (427 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (365 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (114 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Opioid Management are Sukanya Mitra, Paul A. Sloan, Lauren M. Jansson, Lynn R. Webster, Martha L. Vélez, Maria A. Sullivan, Theodore J. Cicero, Eric Prommer, Kenneth L. Kirsh and Lorraine S. Wallace.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Opioid Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Opioid Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Opioid Management.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Opioid Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Opioid Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Opioid Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Opioid Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025