Stephanie Bell

912 total citations
18 papers, 542 citations indexed

About

Stephanie Bell is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephanie Bell has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 542 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 5 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Stephanie Bell's work include Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (7 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers). Stephanie Bell is often cited by papers focused on Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (7 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers). Stephanie Bell collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Stephanie Bell's co-authors include Jayne Lucke, Wayne Hall, Brad Partridge, Bradley Partridge, Coral Gartner, Adrian Carter, Rebecca Mathews, KE Harrington, JJ Strain and Nessa E. O’Connor and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and EMBO Reports.

In The Last Decade

Stephanie Bell

17 papers receiving 521 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephanie Bell Australia 12 320 128 89 61 55 18 542
Martin Andersson Sweden 12 118 0.4× 75 0.6× 32 0.4× 138 2.3× 46 0.8× 16 434
M. Berger Germany 16 138 0.4× 55 0.4× 36 0.4× 74 1.2× 63 1.1× 40 648
In‐Won Chung South Korea 11 95 0.3× 143 1.1× 61 0.7× 180 3.0× 44 0.8× 24 642
Megan E. Kurth United States 12 226 0.7× 25 0.2× 74 0.8× 27 0.4× 131 2.4× 22 473
Jenny H. D. A. van Beek Netherlands 12 103 0.3× 136 1.1× 49 0.6× 199 3.3× 56 1.0× 19 681
Hoa T. Vo United States 14 56 0.2× 92 0.7× 162 1.8× 82 1.3× 37 0.7× 27 465
Catherine Transler Netherlands 13 94 0.3× 115 0.9× 158 1.8× 33 0.5× 102 1.9× 15 893
Bojan Zalar Slovenia 14 54 0.2× 120 0.9× 27 0.3× 134 2.2× 77 1.4× 32 429
Hwei Wuen Chan Singapore 11 49 0.2× 129 1.0× 86 1.0× 107 1.8× 54 1.0× 28 603

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Bell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Bell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Bell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Bell. The network helps show where Stephanie Bell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Bell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Bell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Bell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Bell. Stephanie Bell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Smith, Garrett, Stephanie Bell, John T. Sladky, Peter B. Kang, & Sait Albayram. (2018). Lumbosacral ventral spinal nerve root atrophy identified on MRI in a case of spinal muscular atrophy type II. Clinical Imaging. 53. 134–137.
2.
Bell, Stephanie, Judith A. Dean, Chris Howard, et al.. (2018). Addressing smoking among people living with HIV: a cross-sectional survey of Australian HIV health practitioners’ practices and attitudes. AIDS Care. 31(4). 436–442. 3 indexed citations
3.
Sharma, Ratika, Carla Meurk, Stephanie Bell, Pauline Ford, & Coral Gartner. (2017). Australian health practitioners’ adherence to the 5A’s of smoking cessation and barriers to delivering smoking cessation assistance to smokers with severe mental illness. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1 indexed citations
5.
Sharma, Ratika, Carla Meurk, Stephanie Bell, Pauline Ford, & Coral Gartner. (2017). Australian mental health care practitioners’ practices and attitudes for encouraging smoking cessation and tobacco harm reduction in smokers with severe mental illness. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 27(1). 247–257. 26 indexed citations
6.
Bell, Stephanie, Judith A. Dean, Charles F. Gilks, et al.. (2017). Tobacco Harm Reduction with Vaporised Nicotine (THRiVe): The Study Protocol of an Uncontrolled Feasibility Study of Novel Nicotine Replacement Products among People Living with HIV Who Smoke. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 14(7). 799–799. 11 indexed citations
7.
Roe, Mark, Stephanie Bell, Marine Oseredczuk, et al.. (2013). Updated food composition database for nutrient intake. EFSA Supporting Publications. 10(6). 35 indexed citations
8.
Bell, Stephanie, Adrian Carter, Rebecca Mathews, et al.. (2013). Views of Addiction Neuroscientists and Clinicians on the Clinical Impact of a ‘Brain Disease Model of Addiction’. Neuroethics. 7(1). 19–27. 27 indexed citations
9.
Carter, Adrian, Rebecca Mathews, Stephanie Bell, Jayne Lucke, & Wayne Hall. (2013). Control and Responsibility in Addicted Individuals: What do Addiction Neuroscientists and Clinicians Think?. Neuroethics. 7(2). 205–214. 15 indexed citations
10.
Bell, Stephanie, Brad Partridge, Jayne Lucke, & Wayne Hall. (2012). Australian University Students’ Attitudes Towards the Acceptability and Regulation of Pharmaceuticals to Improve Academic Performance. Neuroethics. 6(1). 197–205. 45 indexed citations
11.
Bell, Stephanie, Jayne Lucke, & Wayne Hall. (2012). Lessons for Enhancement From the History of Cocaine and Amphetamine Use. AJOB Neuroscience. 3(2). 24–29. 23 indexed citations
12.
Partridge, Brad, Stephanie Bell, Jayne Lucke, & Wayne Hall. (2012). Australian university students' attitudes towards the use of prescription stimulants as cognitive enhancers: Perceived patterns of use, efficacy and safety. Drug and Alcohol Review. 32(3). 295–302. 51 indexed citations
13.
Castanheira, Isabel, et al.. (2012). Metrology in Food Composition Databanks: The European Strategy. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT). 2 indexed citations
14.
Partridge, Bradley, et al.. (2011). Smart Drugs “As Common As Coffee”: Media Hype about Neuroenhancement. PLoS ONE. 6(11). e28416–e28416. 132 indexed citations
15.
Lucke, Jayne, Stephanie Bell, Bradley Partridge, & Wayne Hall. (2011). Academic doping or Viagra for the brain?. EMBO Reports. 12(3). 197–201. 29 indexed citations
16.
Lucke, Jayne, Stephanie Bell, Brad Partridge, & Wayne Hall. (2011). Deflating the Neuroenhancement Bubble. AJOB Neuroscience. 2(4). 38–43. 55 indexed citations
17.
Lucke, Jayne, Stephanie Bell, Brad Partridge, & Wayne Hall. (2010). Weak evidence for large claims contribute to the phantom debate. BioSocieties. 5(4). 482–483. 15 indexed citations
18.
Kiely, Máiréad, Albert Flynn, KE Harrington, et al.. (2001). The efficacy and safety of nutritional supplement use in a representative sample of adults in the North/South Ireland Food Consumption Survey. Public Health Nutrition. 4(5a). 1089–1097. 66 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026