Stéphane Barrette
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry top 2%
- Hematology top 10%
- Genetics
- Immunology
- Co-authors
- Albert MoghrabiRichard BéliveauDominique BoivinDenis GingrasSylvie LamyNancy E. SeidelÉdith BeaulieuMark L. Bernstein
- Topics
- Virus-based gene therapy research (6 papers)Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (4 papers)Platelet Disorders and Treatments (3 papers)
- Cited by
- BiochemistryHematologyGenetics
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Stéphane Barrette
26 papers receiving 923 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Molecular Biology 388
- Biochemistry 241
- Hematology 146
- Genetics 136
- Immunology 132
Countries citing papers authored by Stéphane Barrette
This map shows the geographic impact of Stéphane Barrette's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stéphane Barrette with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stéphane Barrette more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stéphane Barrette
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stéphane Barrette. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stéphane Barrette. The network helps show where Stéphane Barrette may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stéphane Barrette
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stéphane Barrette. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stéphane Barrette based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stéphane Barrette. Stéphane Barrette is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The role of psychological characteristics in facilitating the pathway to elite performance among north american cross country skiers | 1 |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 124 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | Inhibition of cancer cell proliferation and suppression of TNF-induced activation of NFkappaB by edible berry juice. | 148 |
| 11 | 56 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 118 | |
| 14 | 59 | |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 42 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Stéphane Barrette
Stéphane Barrette is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Hematology and Toxicology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 967 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virus-based gene therapy research (6 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (4 papers) and Platelet Disorders and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (241 citations), Hematology (146 citations) and Genetics (92 citations). Stéphane Barrette has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Albert Moghrabi, Richard Béliveau, Dominique Boivin, Denis Gingras, Sylvie Lamy, Nancy E. Seidel, Édith Beaulieu, Mark L. Bernstein, David M. Bodine and Janet L. Douglas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.