Stephan Schleim
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Philosophy top 10%
- Co-authors
- Henrik WalterTade Matthias SprangerBoris B. QuednowSusanne ErkIngo RentschlerFelix HaslerThomas FuchsGeorg Northoff
- Topics
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (25 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsRussiaGermany
In The Last Decade
Stephan Schleim
38 papers receiving 287 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Cognitive Neuroscience 224
- Clinical Psychology 73
- Social Psychology 71
- Psychiatry and Mental health 40
- Philosophy 29
Countries citing papers authored by Stephan Schleim
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephan Schleim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephan Schleim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephan Schleim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephan Schleim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephan Schleim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephan Schleim. The network helps show where Stephan Schleim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephan Schleim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephan Schleim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephan Schleim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephan Schleim. Stephan Schleim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | Enhancement – een probleem van betekenis voor de neuro-ethiek? | 1 |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | Hirnforschung: Zu viel versprochen | 0 |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 45 | |
| 17 | Von der Neuroethik zum Neurorecht | 4 |
| 18 | 48 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Stephan Schleim
Stephan Schleim is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Philosophy, having authored 44 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (25 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (224 citations), Social Psychology (71 citations) and Clinical Psychology (73 citations). Stephan Schleim has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Russia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Henrik Walter, Tade Matthias Spranger, Boris B. Quednow, Susanne Erk, Ingo Rentschler, Felix Hasler, Thomas Fuchs, Georg Northoff, Wolfgang Tschacher and Hans Braun. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Frontiers in Pharmacology and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.