Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social–ecological dynamics
2014392 citationsChinwe Ifejika Speranza, Urs Wiesmann et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephan Rist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephan Rist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephan Rist more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephan Rist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephan Rist. The network helps show where Stephan Rist may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephan Rist
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephan Rist.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephan Rist based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephan Rist. Stephan Rist is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Oberlack, Christoph, Sébastien Boillat, Stefan Brönnimann, et al.. (2017). Polycentric governance in telecoupled resource systems: Is the tragedy of the grabbed commons unavoidable?. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).2 indexed citations
6.
Messerli, Peter, et al.. (2017). Sustainable livelihoods in the global land rush? Archetypes of livelihood vulnerability and sustainability potentials. Keynote presentation.. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).1 indexed citations
Jacobi, Johanna & Stephan Rist. (2015). Towards food sustainability: reshaping the coexistence of different food systems in South America and Africa. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).2 indexed citations
Rist, Stephan, et al.. (2012). Promoting local innovations (PLI) for community-based climate change adaptation in coastal areas : a facilitator's guide to the PLI workshop. IUCN eBooks.1 indexed citations
Mathez-Stiefel, Sarah-Lan, et al.. (2011). Abriendo nuevas perspectivas para la juventud campesina de los Andes a través de la valorización de los productos de la agrobiodiversidad. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).3 indexed citations
17.
Rist, Stephan, et al.. (2009). Transdisciplinary knowledge production in organic agriculture.. 16(10). 414–419.1 indexed citations
18.
Rist, Stephan. (2005). Desarrollo endógeno como un proceso social. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).1 indexed citations
19.
Rist, Stephan. (2005). Endogenous Development as a Social Learning Process. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).5 indexed citations
20.
Rist, Stephan, Thomas Alföldi, W. Lockeretz, & U. Niggli. (2000). Hidden organic food production: a new approach for enhancing sustainable agriculture in developing countries.. 657–660.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.