Stephan Jennewein

660 total citations
9 papers, 448 citations indexed

About

Stephan Jennewein is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephan Jennewein has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 448 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 2 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Stephan Jennewein's work include Quantum optics and atomic interactions (6 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (6 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (3 papers). Stephan Jennewein is often cited by papers focused on Quantum optics and atomic interactions (6 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (6 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (3 papers). Stephan Jennewein collaborates with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and United States. Stephan Jennewein's co-authors include Antoine Browaeys, Yvan R. P. Sortais, Janne Ruostekoski, S. D. Jenkins, Ronan Bourgain, J. Pellegrino, Jean‐Jacques Greffet, Juha Javanainen, Christophe Sauvan and Nick J. Schilder and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. A and arXiv (Cornell University).

In The Last Decade

Stephan Jennewein

9 papers receiving 434 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephan Jennewein France 7 432 195 64 26 25 9 448
Robert J. Bettles United Kingdom 5 401 0.9× 177 0.9× 22 0.3× 40 1.5× 22 0.9× 7 423
Philippe W. Courteille Germany 10 280 0.6× 106 0.5× 17 0.3× 37 1.4× 9 0.4× 17 303
David Paredes-Barato Spain 5 385 0.9× 191 1.0× 11 0.2× 13 0.5× 16 0.6× 7 394
Shanchao Zhang Hong Kong 14 655 1.5× 400 2.1× 35 0.5× 12 0.5× 5 0.2× 30 672
Teodora Kirova Latvia 12 369 0.9× 98 0.5× 30 0.5× 15 0.6× 23 0.9× 24 376
Neil Corzo United States 11 489 1.1× 342 1.8× 26 0.4× 35 1.3× 6 0.2× 13 527
Clément Lacroûte France 8 462 1.1× 175 0.9× 10 0.2× 35 1.3× 9 0.4× 20 490
Leon Karpa Germany 11 419 1.0× 121 0.6× 12 0.2× 12 0.5× 27 1.1× 18 432
A. M. Tumaĭkin Russia 12 560 1.3× 65 0.3× 31 0.5× 13 0.5× 41 1.6× 50 564

Countries citing papers authored by Stephan Jennewein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephan Jennewein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephan Jennewein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephan Jennewein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephan Jennewein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephan Jennewein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephan Jennewein. The network helps show where Stephan Jennewein may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephan Jennewein

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephan Jennewein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephan Jennewein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephan Jennewein. Stephan Jennewein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Jennewein, Stephan, Yvan R. P. Sortais, Antoine Browaeys, et al.. (2018). Coherent scattering of near-resonant light by a dense, microscopic cloud of cold two-level atoms: Experiment versus theory. Physical review. A. 97(5). 32 indexed citations
2.
Jenkins, S. D., Janne Ruostekoski, Juha Javanainen, et al.. (2016). Optical resonance shifts in the fluorescence imaging of thermal and cold Rubidium atomic gases. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
3.
Jenkins, S. D., Janne Ruostekoski, Juha Javanainen, et al.. (2016). Optical Resonance Shifts in the Fluorescence of Thermal and Cold Atomic Gases. Physical Review Letters. 116(18). 183601–183601. 63 indexed citations
4.
Jennewein, Stephan, Mondher Besbes, Nick J. Schilder, et al.. (2016). Coherent Scattering of Near-Resonant Light by a Dense Microscopic Cold Atomic Cloud. Physical Review Letters. 116(23). 233601–233601. 94 indexed citations
5.
Schilder, Nick J., Christophe Sauvan, Jean‐Paul Hugonin, et al.. (2016). Polaritonic modes in a dense cloud of cold atoms. Physical review. A. 93(6). 35 indexed citations
6.
Jenkins, S. D., Janne Ruostekoski, Juha Javanainen, et al.. (2016). Collective resonance fluorescence in small and dense atom clouds: Comparison between theory and experiment. Physical review. A. 94(2). 60 indexed citations
7.
Jennewein, Stephan, Yvan R. P. Sortais, Jean‐Jacques Greffet, & Antoine Browaeys. (2016). Propagation of light through small clouds of cold interacting atoms. Physical review. A. 94(5). 10 indexed citations
8.
Schilder, Nick J., Christophe Sauvan, Jean-Paul Hugonin, et al.. (2015). Role of polaritonic modes on light scattering from a dense cloud of atoms. arXiv (Cornell University). 6 indexed citations
9.
Pellegrino, J., Ronan Bourgain, Stephan Jennewein, et al.. (2014). Observation of Suppression of Light Scattering Induced by Dipole-Dipole Interactions in a Cold-Atom Ensemble. Physical Review Letters. 113(13). 133602–133602. 147 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026