Sten Vammen

1.3k citations
30 papers · 982 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Sten Vammen

30 papers receiving 951 citations

Peers

Sten Vammen
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 833
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 510
  • Surgery 338
  • Microbiology 42
  • Research and Theory 2
Replace S. Ockert with:
S. Ockert Germany
Richard Sim Singapore
Johanna M. Kwakkel‐van Erp Netherlands
Joseph M. Sutton United States
Martin Claridge United Kingdom
Nathalie Waser United States
Sébastien Renard France
Steven A. Sahn United States
A. Patterson United States
Mariska Kemna United States
Sten Vammen relative to S. Ockert Germany S. Ockert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
S. Ockert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sten Vammen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sten Vammen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sten Vammen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sten Vammen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sten Vammen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sten Vammen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sten Vammen. The network helps show where Sten Vammen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Sten Vammen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sten Vammen Line = papers co-authored together Sten Vammen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999164
2 2001119
3 2000118
4 200098
5 200194
6 200167
7 200064
8 200060
9 199940
10 200138
11 200116
12
A comparative study of iliac and abdominal aortic aneurysms.
200012
13 200211
14 200011
15 20149
16 19998
17 20147
18 19986
19 19986
20
[What are the direct costs of an abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a Danish hospital?].
20016

About Sten Vammen

Sten Vammen is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Microbiology and Epidemiology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 982 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (19 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (5 papers), Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions (5 papers), Case Reports on Hematomas (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (3 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (833 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (510 citations), Surgery (338 citations), Microbiology (42 citations) and Research and Theory (2 citations). Sten Vammen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jes S. Lindholt, H Fasting, E W Henneberg, Lene Heickendorff, Svend Juul, Lars Østergaard, Niels H. H. Heegaard, Andrew W. Bradbury, Katie A. Wilson and Peter R. Hoskins. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, British journal of surgery, The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, Foot & Ankle International and Vascular and Endovascular Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact