Steffen Lempp

1.3k citations
77 papers · 543 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Steffen Lempp

71 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

Steffen Lempp
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 527
  • Geometry and Topology 169
  • Statistics and Probability 103
  • Algebra and Number Theory 25
  • Artificial Intelligence 154
Replace Reed Solomon with:
Reed Solomon United States
Sebastiaan A. Terwijn Netherlands
Alexander Melnikov New Zealand
Dag Normann Norway
Alberto Marcone Italy
Tibor Neubrunn Slovakia
Piotr Koszmider Poland
Wolfram Pohlers Germany
Jian-Zhong Xiao China
Martin Goldstern Austria
Steffen Lempp relative to Reed Solomon United States Reed Solomon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Reed Solomon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steffen Lempp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steffen Lempp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steffen Lempp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steffen Lempp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steffen Lempp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steffen Lempp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steffen Lempp. The network helps show where Steffen Lempp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steffen Lempp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steffen Lempp Line = papers co-authored together Steffen Lempp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199137
2 201428
3 201427
4 198925
5 200322
6 200220
7 200919
8 200519
9 200119
10 200717
11 200716
12 199316
13 199814
14 200313
15 199712
16 198712
17 200311
18 199911
19 199710
20 200910

About Steffen Lempp

Steffen Lempp is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability and Mathematical Physics, having authored 77 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (73 papers), semigroups and automata theory (49 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (28 papers), Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection (11 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (9 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (9 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (8 papers) and Cellular Automata and Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (527 citations), Geometry and Topology (169 citations), Statistics and Probability (103 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (25 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (154 citations). Steffen Lempp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Rodney G. Downey, Reed Solomon, Manuel Lerman, S. Barry Cooper, С. С. Гончаров, Theodore A. Slaman, Denis R. Hirschfeldt, André Nies, Antonio Montalbán and Joseph S. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Symbolic Logic, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, Journal of Mathematical Logic and Advances in Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact