Countries citing papers authored by Stefano Bistarelli
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stefano Bistarelli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefano Bistarelli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefano Bistarelli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stefano Bistarelli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefano Bistarelli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefano Bistarelli. The network helps show where Stefano Bistarelli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stefano Bistarelli
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stefano Bistarelli.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stefano Bistarelli based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stefano Bistarelli. Stefano Bistarelli is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bistarelli, Stefano, et al.. (2020). A labelling semantics for weighted argumentation frameworks. 2710. 263–277.1 indexed citations
6.
Bistarelli, Stefano, et al.. (2020). A first overview of ICCMA’19. 2777. 90–102.1 indexed citations
7.
Bistarelli, Stefano, et al.. (2019). A tool for ranking arguments through voting-games power indexes. 2396. 193–201.1 indexed citations
8.
Bistarelli, Stefano & Francesco Santini. (2019). An introduction to optimal stable marriage problems and argumentation frameworks. 2528. 80–84.1 indexed citations
9.
Bistarelli, Stefano & Francesco Santini. (2018). Some Thoughts On Well-Foundedness in Weighted Abstract Argumentation.. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. 623–624.1 indexed citations
10.
Bistarelli, Stefano, et al.. (2016). Mechanism Design Approach for Energy Efficiency. arXiv (Cornell University). 34–34.1 indexed citations
11.
Bistarelli, Stefano, Fabio Rossi, & Francesco Santini. (2016). A Collective Defence Against Grouped Attacks for Weighted Abstract Argumentation Frameworks.. The Florida AI Research Society. 638–643.6 indexed citations
12.
Benedetti, Irene, et al.. (2014). On Relating Voting Systems and Argumentation Frameworks.. 1195. 309–313.1 indexed citations
13.
Bistarelli, Stefano, et al.. (2007). Abstracting Soft Constraints: Some Experimental Results on Fuzzy CSPs. Research Padua Archive (University of Padua).
14.
Bistarelli, Stefano. (2004). Semirings for Soft Constraint Solving and Programming (LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE). Springer eBooks.12 indexed citations
15.
Bistarelli, Stefano, Jerome Kelleher, & Barry O’Sullivan. (2003). Symmetry Breaking in Soft CSPs.1 indexed citations
16.
Bistarelli, Stefano, et al.. (2003). A Local Search Framework for Semiring-Based Constraint Satisfaction Problems.2 indexed citations
17.
Bistarelli, Stefano, Rosella Gennari, & Francesca Rossi. (2000). Constraint Propagation for Soft Constraints: Generalization and Termination Conditions.3 indexed citations
18.
Bistarelli, Stefano, et al.. (1999). Abstracting Soft Constraints. Research Padua Archive (University of Padua).1 indexed citations
19.
Bistarelli, Stefano, et al.. (1999). Labeling and Partial Arc Consistency for Soft Constraints.. 121–136.1 indexed citations
20.
Bistarelli, Stefano & Elvinia Riccobene. (1997). An operational model for the SCLP language.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.