Stefan Umbreit
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Geophysics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Frederic A. RasioMeagan MorscherBharath PattabiramanCarl L. RodriguezWill M. FarrSourav ChatterjeeJohn M. FregeauSusanne Pfalzner
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (11 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (5 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (5 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyFinland
In The Last Decade
Stefan Umbreit
12 papers receiving 510 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 524
- Instrumentation 95
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 31
- Geophysics 18
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 15
Countries citing papers authored by Stefan Umbreit
This map shows the geographic impact of Stefan Umbreit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefan Umbreit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefan Umbreit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stefan Umbreit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefan Umbreit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefan Umbreit. The network helps show where Stefan Umbreit may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stefan Umbreit
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stefan Umbreit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stefan Umbreit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stefan Umbreit. Stefan Umbreit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186 | |
| 2 | 61 | |
| 3 | 43 | |
| 4 | 89 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 38 |
About Stefan Umbreit
Stefan Umbreit is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 533 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (11 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (5 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (524 citations), Instrumentation (95 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (31 citations). Stefan Umbreit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Frederic A. Rasio, Meagan Morscher, Bharath Pattabiraman, Carl L. Rodriguez, Will M. Farr, Sourav Chatterjee, John M. Fregeau, Susanne Pfalzner, Th. Henning and V. Kalogera. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.