Nathan W. C. Leigh
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 65
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 49
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 37
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 32
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 30
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 27
- Astro and Planetary Science 19
- Instrumentation top 2%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 14
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Geophysics top 10%
Nathan W. C. Leigh
96 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.6k
- Instrumentation 418
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 190
- Geophysics 94
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 50
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan W. C. Leigh
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan W. C. Leigh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan W. C. Leigh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan W. C. Leigh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan W. C. Leigh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan W. C. Leigh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan W. C. Leigh. The network helps show where Nathan W. C. Leigh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan W. C. Leigh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 60 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 15 | Detection of White Dwarf companions to Blue Straggler Stars from UVIT observations of M67 | 2019 | 4 |
| 16 | 2019 | 128 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 19 | On the Apparent Dichotomy Between the Masses of Black Holes Inferred via X-rays and via Gravitational Waves | 2019 | 2 |
| 20 | Constraining Stellar-mass Black Hole Mergers in AGN Disks Detectable with LIGO | 2018 | 73 |
About Nathan W. C. Leigh
Nathan W. C. Leigh is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 98 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (65 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (49 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (37 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (32 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (30 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (27 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (19 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.6k citations), Instrumentation (418 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (190 citations). Nathan W. C. Leigh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alison Sills, C. Knigge, Rosalba Perna, Nora Lützgendorf, Aaron M. Geller, Mirek Giersz, Giacomo Fragione, Torsten Böker, Barry McKernan and K. E. Saavik Ford. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.