Nathan W. C. Leigh
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Instrumentation top 2%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Geophysics top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Alison SillsC. KniggeRosalba PernaNora LützgendorfAaron M. GellerMirek GierszGiacomo FragioneTorsten Böker
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (65 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (49 papers)Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (37 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChileCanada
In The Last Decade
Nathan W. C. Leigh
96 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.6k
- Instrumentation 418
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 190
- Geophysics 94
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 89
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan W. C. Leigh
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan W. C. Leigh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan W. C. Leigh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan W. C. Leigh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan W. C. Leigh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan W. C. Leigh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan W. C. Leigh. The network helps show where Nathan W. C. Leigh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan W. C. Leigh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan W. C. Leigh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan W. C. Leigh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan W. C. Leigh. Nathan W. C. Leigh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 60 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | Detection of White Dwarf companions to Blue Straggler Stars from UVIT observations of M67 | 4 |
| 16 | 128 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | On the Apparent Dichotomy Between the Masses of Black Holes Inferred via X-rays and via Gravitational Waves | 2 |
| 20 | Constraining Stellar-mass Black Hole Mergers in AGN Disks Detectable with LIGO | 73 |
About Nathan W. C. Leigh
Nathan W. C. Leigh is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 98 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (65 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (49 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (37 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.6k citations), Instrumentation (418 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (190 citations). Nathan W. C. Leigh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alison Sills, C. Knigge, Rosalba Perna, Nora Lützgendorf, Aaron M. Geller, Mirek Giersz, Giacomo Fragione, Torsten Böker, Barry McKernan and K. E. Saavik Ford. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.