Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Experimental observation of scaling laws for alternating current and direct current conductivity in polymer-carbon nanotube composite thin films
Countries citing papers authored by Stefan Hutzler
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stefan Hutzler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefan Hutzler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefan Hutzler more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefan Hutzler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefan Hutzler. The network helps show where Stefan Hutzler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stefan Hutzler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stefan Hutzler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stefan Hutzler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stefan Hutzler. Stefan Hutzler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mughal, A., Stefan Hutzler, & D. Weaire. (2023). Coulomb Calligraphy. Forma. 38(1). 1–5.2 indexed citations
5.
Mughal, A., et al.. (2023). Stability maps for columnar structures. The Philosophical Magazine A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics. 103(14). 1328–1344.1 indexed citations
6.
Mughal, A., Stefan Hutzler, & D. Weaire. (2023). Equilibrium states of confined ions in two dimensions. The Philosophical Magazine A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics. 103(6). 595–609.4 indexed citations
Mughal, A., et al.. (2012). Dense packings of spheres in cylinders. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2012.5 indexed citations
13.
Weaire, D. & Stefan Hutzler. (2009). Foam as a complex system. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter. 21(47). 474227–474227.7 indexed citations
14.
Andersson, Martin, John Banhart, H. Caps, et al.. (2008). Foam Research in Microgravity. HZB Repository (Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH (HZB)). 25(3). 241–244.2 indexed citations
García‐Moreno, Francisco, Norbert Babcsán, John Banhart, et al.. (2005). Development of advanced foams in microgravity. HZB Repository (Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH (HZB)). 1290. 126–135.1 indexed citations
18.
Langévin, D., Arnaud Saint‐Jalmes, Sébastien Marze, et al.. (2005). Hydrodynamics of wet foams. ESA Special Publication. 1290. 136–149.3 indexed citations
19.
Weaire, D., Stefan Hutzler, G. Verbist, & E.A.J.F. Peters. (1997). A Review of Foam Drainage. 315–374.107 indexed citations
20.
Domens, P., et al.. (1983). Physical Properties of Leaders in Large Air Gap Discharges. 1. 166.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.