Stan G. Daberkow

26 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers

Stan G. Daberkow
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 378
  • Plant Science 275
  • Economics and Econometrics 136
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 79
  • Soil Science 79
Replace Jeanne M. Reeves with:
Jeanne M. Reeves United States
M. Edward Rister United States
Angelika Wurbs Germany
Margarita Velandia United States
Markus Gandorfer Germany
Geoff Kuehne Australia
Timothy Kelley United States
Gholamhossein Abdollahzadeh Iran
Thomas Lindenthal Austria
W. Marshall Frasier United States
Stan G. Daberkow relative to Jeanne M. Reeves United States Jeanne M. Reeves's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Jeanne M. Reeves · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stan G. Daberkow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stan G. Daberkow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stan G. Daberkow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stan G. Daberkow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stan G. Daberkow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stan G. Daberkow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stan G. Daberkow. The network helps show where Stan G. Daberkow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stan G. Daberkow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stan G. Daberkow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stan G. Daberkow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stan G. Daberkow. Stan G. Daberkow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
U.S. pollination markets: Recent changes and historical perspective
14
2 3
3 3
4 57
5 100
6 295
7
Nutrient management programs, nitrogen fertilizer practices, and groundwater quality in Nebraska's Central Platte Valley (U.S.), 1989-1998.
1
8 68
9 8
10
Attitudes about precision agriculture innovations among U.S. corn growers.
2
11 43
12 27
13
Adoption rates for selected crop management practices
0
14 1
15 1
16 1
17 4
18 2
19 2
20 3

About Stan G. Daberkow

Stan G. Daberkow is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Geochemistry and Petrology and Soil Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 722 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural Economics and Policy (6 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (6 papers) and Smart Agriculture and AI (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (378 citations), Soil Science (79 citations) and Plant Science (275 citations). Stan G. Daberkow has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include William D. McBride, Jorge Fernandez‐Cornejo, Katherine H. Reichelderfer, P. C. Robert, W. E. Larson, R. H. Rust, Charles H. Barnard, James Lowenberg‐DeBoer, Mark E. Smith and Dayton M. Lambert. Their work appears in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Public Administration Review and American Journal of Agricultural Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026