Stacy Ruther
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Pharmacology
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Greg MarchandKatelyn SainzGiovanna BrazilKelly WareHollie UlibarriCatherine CoriellAmanda ArroyoJulia Parise
- Topics
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments (5 papers)Gynecological conditions and treatments (5 papers)Endometriosis Research and Treatment (5 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyJAMA Network OpenObstetrical & Gynecological Survey
- Partner nations
- United StatesEgyptCambodia
In The Last Decade
Stacy Ruther
24 papers receiving 293 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 130
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 120
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 112
- Pharmacology 70
- Surgery 57
Countries citing papers authored by Stacy Ruther
This map shows the geographic impact of Stacy Ruther's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacy Ruther with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacy Ruther more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stacy Ruther
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacy Ruther. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacy Ruther. The network helps show where Stacy Ruther may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacy Ruther
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacy Ruther. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacy Ruther based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacy Ruther. Stacy Ruther is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 75 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Stacy Ruther
Stacy Ruther is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Complementary and Manual Therapy, having authored 28 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (5 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (5 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (120 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (130 citations) and Pharmacology (70 citations). Stacy Ruther has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Cambodia. Frequent co-authors include Greg Marchand, Katelyn Sainz, Giovanna Brazil, Kelly Ware, Hollie Ulibarri, Catherine Coriell, Amanda Arroyo, Julia Parise, Ahmed Taher Masoud and Alexa King. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, JAMA Network Open and Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.