Stacey Wolfson
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 21
- Neural dynamics and brain function 7
- Aesthetic Perception and Analysis 5
-
- Color Science and Applications 14
- Co-authors
- Michael S. LandyNorma GrahamEric KimLinda MoyNan WuKyunghyun ChoYiqiu ShenKrzysztof J. Geras
- Journals
- Journal of Vision (12 papers)Vision Research (6 papers)Radiology (2 papers)Journal of the Optical Society of America A (1 paper)Visual Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Stacey Wolfson
20 papers receiving 330 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Cognitive Neuroscience 239
- General Decision Sciences 6
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 65
- Sensory Systems 14
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 75
Countries citing papers authored by Stacey Wolfson
This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey Wolfson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey Wolfson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey Wolfson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey Wolfson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey Wolfson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey Wolfson. The network helps show where Stacey Wolfson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Stacey Wolfson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 27 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 17 | Increment and decrement probes in the probed-sinewave paradigm | 2000 | 1 |
| 18 | 1999 | 25 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 51 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 67 |
About Stacey Wolfson
Stacey Wolfson is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Small Animals and Media Technology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (21 papers), Color Science and Applications (14 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (5 papers), Image Enhancement Techniques (3 papers), Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis (2 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (2 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (239 citations), General Decision Sciences (6 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (65 citations), Sensory Systems (14 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (75 citations). Stacey Wolfson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. Landy, Norma Graham, Eric Kim, Linda Moy, Nan Wu, Kyunghyun Cho, Yiqiu Shen, Krzysztof J. Geras, Jingyi Su and Xian Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Vision Research, Radiology, Journal of the Optical Society of America A and Visual Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.