Stacey Stewart

1.5k total citations
8 papers, 234 citations indexed

About

Stacey Stewart is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Stacey Stewart has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 234 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 3 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 2 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Stacey Stewart's work include Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (4 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (2 papers). Stacey Stewart is often cited by papers focused on Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (4 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (2 papers). Stacey Stewart collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Stacey Stewart's co-authors include Nicholas L. Mills, Amy V. Ferry, Kuan Ken Lee, Fiona E. Strachan, Lucy Marshall, Andrew R. Chapman, Atul Anand, Anoop Shah, Anthony E. Bourgeois and Michael C. Meyers and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Age and Ageing.

In The Last Decade

Stacey Stewart

8 papers receiving 225 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stacey Stewart United Kingdom 6 149 72 46 26 26 8 234
Mohamed ElMaghawry Egypt 10 232 1.6× 40 0.6× 31 0.7× 13 0.5× 56 2.2× 26 287
Sarah Weeks Canada 9 160 1.1× 80 1.1× 38 0.8× 21 0.8× 8 0.3× 24 254
Sanyog G. Shitole United States 11 107 0.7× 17 0.2× 72 1.6× 81 3.1× 2 0.1× 27 316
Zachary T. Yoneda United States 9 201 1.3× 13 0.2× 126 2.7× 19 0.7× 12 0.5× 24 327
Charle Viljoen South Africa 12 231 1.6× 17 0.2× 129 2.8× 45 1.7× 41 367
Justin E. Tang United States 12 25 0.2× 51 0.7× 83 1.8× 57 2.2× 7 0.3× 35 341
Jorge Toquero Spain 11 333 2.2× 78 1.1× 106 2.3× 26 1.0× 7 0.3× 32 420
Milla Arabadjian United States 10 268 1.8× 35 0.5× 90 2.0× 8 0.3× 4 0.2× 27 309
Noreen T. Nazir United States 10 151 1.0× 67 0.9× 26 0.6× 20 0.8× 27 254
Selma Audi United Kingdom 6 150 1.0× 81 1.1× 131 2.8× 36 1.4× 1 0.0× 9 345

Countries citing papers authored by Stacey Stewart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey Stewart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey Stewart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey Stewart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey Stewart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey Stewart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey Stewart. The network helps show where Stacey Stewart may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacey Stewart

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacey Stewart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacey Stewart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacey Stewart. Stacey Stewart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Lowry, Matthew T.H., Dorien M. Kimenai, Anda Bularga, et al.. (2024). The electronic frailty index and outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction. Age and Ageing. 53(7). 2 indexed citations
2.
Lee, Kuan Ken, Anda Bularga, Rachel O’Brien, et al.. (2021). Troponin-Guided Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography After Exclusion of Myocardial Infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 78(14). 1407–1417. 25 indexed citations
3.
Hanson, Coral L, Robyn Gallagher, Ronan E. O’Carroll, et al.. (2020). Atrial fibrillation self-management: a mobile telephone app scoping review and content analysis. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 20(4). 305–314. 17 indexed citations
4.
Ferry, Amy V., Fiona E. Strachan, Stacey Stewart, et al.. (2020). Exploring Patient Experience of Chest Pain Before and After Implementation of an Early Rule-Out Pathway for Myocardial Infarction: A Qualitative Study. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 75(4). 502–513. 8 indexed citations
5.
Ferry, Amy V., Atul Anand, Fiona E. Strachan, et al.. (2019). Presenting Symptoms in Men and Women Diagnosed With Myocardial Infarction Using Sex‐Specific Criteria. Journal of the American Heart Association. 8(17). e012307–e012307. 79 indexed citations
6.
Bularga, Anda, Kuan Ken Lee, Stacey Stewart, et al.. (2019). High-Sensitivity Troponin and the Application of Risk Stratification Thresholds in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome. Circulation. 140(19). 1557–1568. 62 indexed citations
7.
Stewart, Stacey & Rhona M. Hanning. (2012). Building osteoporosis prevention into dental practice.. PubMed. 78. c29–c29. 5 indexed citations
8.
Meyers, Michael C., Anthony E. Bourgeois, Stacey Stewart, & Arnold LeUnes. (1992). Predicting Pain Response In Athletes: Development and Assessment of the Sports Inventory for Pain. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 14(3). 249–261. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026