Stacey D. Smith

4.0k total citations
77 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Stacey D. Smith is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Stacey D. Smith has authored 77 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 51 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 40 papers in Molecular Biology and 23 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Stacey D. Smith's work include Plant and animal studies (42 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (21 papers) and Plant Gene Expression Analysis (17 papers). Stacey D. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (42 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (21 papers) and Plant Gene Expression Analysis (17 papers). Stacey D. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Argentina. Stacey D. Smith's co-authors include David Baum, Mark D. Rausher, Cécile Ané, Julienne Ng, Antonis Rokas, Sam S Donovan, Marc T. J. Johnson, Julia Dupin, Lynn Bohs and Richard G. Olmstead and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Stacey D. Smith

73 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stacey D. Smith United States 28 1.6k 1.4k 941 665 468 77 2.8k
Chelsea D. Specht United States 33 1.6k 1.0× 1.8k 1.3× 1.4k 1.4× 449 0.7× 291 0.6× 115 3.3k
Benjamin K. Blackman United States 26 950 0.6× 1.1k 0.8× 1.3k 1.4× 1.5k 2.2× 607 1.3× 39 3.4k
Melissa Luckow United States 23 1.2k 0.8× 499 0.4× 776 0.8× 328 0.5× 237 0.5× 33 2.0k
Larry Hufford United States 26 1.7k 1.1× 1.2k 0.9× 772 0.8× 300 0.5× 209 0.4× 74 2.2k
Yaniv Brandvain United States 23 803 0.5× 688 0.5× 585 0.6× 1.0k 1.6× 386 0.8× 61 2.0k
Taran Grant Brazil 28 1.8k 1.2× 669 0.5× 188 0.2× 1.1k 1.7× 895 1.9× 111 4.7k
Benoît Pujol France 25 879 0.6× 485 0.4× 762 0.8× 1.0k 1.6× 419 0.9× 62 2.5k
Thomas R. Meagher United States 35 2.1k 1.4× 894 0.7× 1.4k 1.5× 1.1k 1.6× 1.4k 2.9× 79 3.4k
John Trueman Australia 24 1.2k 0.7× 542 0.4× 736 0.8× 1.2k 1.7× 211 0.5× 58 2.8k
Tami Cruickshank United States 7 783 0.5× 427 0.3× 218 0.2× 1.2k 1.9× 333 0.7× 9 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Stacey D. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey D. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey D. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey D. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey D. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey D. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey D. Smith. The network helps show where Stacey D. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacey D. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacey D. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacey D. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacey D. Smith. Stacey D. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kiel, Carrie A., et al.. (2026). Flowers occupy color‐space extremes: an anthocyanin‐derived theoretical floral color‐space approach. American Journal of Botany. 113(1). e70149–e70149.
2.
Smith, Stacey D., et al.. (2026). Flower clades and fruit clades: Trade‐offs in color diversification across angiosperms. American Journal of Botany. 113(1). e70146–e70146.
3.
Dellinger, Agnes S., et al.. (2025). Does the abiotic environment influence the distribution of flower and fruit colors?. American Journal of Botany. 113(1). e70044–e70044. 5 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Stacey D., et al.. (2025). Decay of self-incompatibility within a lifespan in Physalis acutifolia (Solanaceae). Plant Reproduction. 38(1). 7–7.
5.
Dellinger, Agnes S., Laura P. Lagomarsino, Fabián A. Michelangeli, Stefan Dullinger, & Stacey D. Smith. (2024). The Sequential Direct and Indirect Effects of Mountain Uplift, Climatic Niche, and Floral Trait Evolution on Diversification Dynamics in an Andean Plant Clade. Systematic Biology. 73(3). 594–612. 10 indexed citations
6.
Deanna, Rocío, Camila Martínez, Steven R. Manchester, et al.. (2023). Fossil berries reveal global radiation of the nightshade family by the early Cenozoic. New Phytologist. 238(6). 2685–2697. 4 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Stacey D., et al.. (2023). How does a self‐incompatible individual transition to self‐compatibility during its lifetime?. American Journal of Botany. 110(4). e16150–e16150. 2 indexed citations
8.
Deanna, Rocío, et al.. (2022). How to approach the study of syndromes in macroevolution and ecology. Ecology and Evolution. 12(3). e8583–e8583. 9 indexed citations
9.
10.
Wheeler, Lucas C. & Stacey D. Smith. (2019). Computational Modeling of Anthocyanin Pathway Evolution: Biases, Hotspots, and Trade-offs. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 59(3). 585–598. 18 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Stacey D., Ruthie Angelovici, Karolina Heyduk, et al.. (2019). The renaissance of comparative biochemistry. American Journal of Botany. 106(1). 3–13. 4 indexed citations
12.
Dupin, Julia & Stacey D. Smith. (2019). Integrating historical biogeography and environmental niche evolution to understand the geographic distribution of Datureae. American Journal of Botany. 106(5). 667–678. 7 indexed citations
13.
Deanna, Rocío, Maximilian Larter, Gloria E. Barboza, & Stacey D. Smith. (2019). Repeated evolution of a morphological novelty: a phylogenetic analysis of the inflated fruiting calyx in the Physalideae tribe (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany. 106(2). 270–279. 28 indexed citations
14.
O’Neil, Julie, Michele E. Ewing, Stacey D. Smith, & Sean Williams. (2018). A Delphi Study to Identify Standards for Internal Communication. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12 indexed citations
15.
Dupin, Julia, Nicholas J. Matzke, Tiina Särkinen, et al.. (2016). Bayesian estimation of the global biogeographical history of the Solanaceae. Journal of Biogeography. 44(4). 887–899. 228 indexed citations
16.
Gates, Daniel J., Susan R. Strickler, Lukas A. Mueller, Bradley J. S. C. Olson, & Stacey D. Smith. (2016). Diversification of R2R3-MYB Transcription Factors in the Tomato Family Solanaceae. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 83(1-2). 26–37. 17 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Stacey D. & Emma E. Goldberg. (2015). Tempo and mode of flower color evolution. American Journal of Botany. 102(7). 1014–1025. 37 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Stacey D., Shunqi Wang, & Mark D. Rausher. (2012). Functional Evolution of an Anthocyanin Pathway Enzyme during a Flower Color Transition. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 30(3). 602–612. 62 indexed citations
19.
Johnson, Marc T. J., Stacey D. Smith, & Mark D. Rausher. (2010). Effects of plant sex on range distributions and allocation to reproduction. New Phytologist. 186(3). 769–779. 42 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Stacey D., et al.. (1994). Instantaneous GPS Attitude Tests: Cycle Ambiguity Resolved. 683–688. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026