Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Petroc SumnerChris ChambersJacky BoivinBethan HughesChristos VenetisBethan DaltonFrédéric BoyAndrew Williams
- Topics
- Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers)Climate Change Communication and Perception (2 papers)
- Journals
- Psychological BulletinPLoS ONEBMJ
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths
6 papers receiving 440 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Sociology and Political Science 145
- Cognitive Neuroscience 59
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 54
- General Health Professions 52
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 51
Countries citing papers authored by Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths
This map shows the geographic impact of Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths. The network helps show where Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths. Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27 | |
| 2 | 31 | |
| 3 | 92 | |
| 4 | 37 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 281 |
About Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths
Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 6 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (54 citations), General Decision Sciences (13 citations) and Applied Psychology (36 citations). Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Petroc Sumner, Chris Chambers, Jacky Boivin, Bethan Hughes, Christos Venetis, Bethan Dalton, Frédéric Boy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Davies and Lewis Bott. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, PLoS ONE and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.