S.J. Charter

978 total citations
11 papers, 686 citations indexed

About

S.J. Charter is a scholar working on Genetics, Plant Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, S.J. Charter has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 686 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Genetics, 7 papers in Plant Science and 6 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in S.J. Charter's work include Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (7 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (5 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers). S.J. Charter is often cited by papers focused on Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (7 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (5 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers). S.J. Charter collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Portugal. S.J. Charter's co-authors include Marlys L. Houck, Oliver A. Ryder, Chris Venditti, Steven N. Austad, Nuno Gomes, Jerry W. Shay, William H. Walker, Mark Pagel, Woodring E. Wright and A.T. Kumamoto and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Methods, Molecular Ecology and Biology of Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

S.J. Charter

11 papers receiving 663 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S.J. Charter United States 8 295 252 191 149 98 11 686
Marco Santagostino Italy 14 378 1.3× 249 1.0× 189 1.0× 66 0.4× 69 0.7× 24 684
Taís Harumi de Castro Sasahara Brazil 9 113 0.4× 132 0.5× 51 0.3× 108 0.7× 58 0.6× 46 414
Jane P. Kenney‐Hunt United States 18 290 1.0× 110 0.4× 572 3.0× 9 0.1× 52 0.5× 26 918
Alexander Klimovich Germany 13 258 0.9× 33 0.1× 65 0.3× 28 0.2× 107 1.1× 32 626
Weronika Rupik Poland 14 184 0.6× 49 0.2× 113 0.6× 16 0.1× 84 0.9× 40 479
Hiba Waldman Ben‐Asher Israel 16 327 1.1× 36 0.1× 45 0.2× 24 0.2× 196 2.0× 31 676
M. Garcı́a Spain 24 930 3.2× 193 0.8× 776 4.1× 46 0.3× 33 0.3× 79 1.8k
Jim A. Mossman United States 15 276 0.9× 41 0.2× 214 1.1× 34 0.2× 146 1.5× 23 583
Maurice G. Kleve United States 10 143 0.5× 22 0.1× 49 0.3× 32 0.2× 157 1.6× 29 511
Zixia Huang Ireland 13 221 0.7× 53 0.2× 90 0.5× 84 0.6× 86 0.9× 25 574

Countries citing papers authored by S.J. Charter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S.J. Charter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S.J. Charter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S.J. Charter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S.J. Charter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S.J. Charter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S.J. Charter. The network helps show where S.J. Charter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S.J. Charter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S.J. Charter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S.J. Charter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S.J. Charter. S.J. Charter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Steiner, Cynthia, et al.. (2015). Chromosomal variation and perinatal mortality in San Diego zoo Soemmerring's gazelles. Zoo Biology. 34(4). 374–384. 6 indexed citations
3.
Steiner, Cynthia, S.J. Charter, Marlys L. Houck, & Oliver A. Ryder. (2014). Molecular Phylogeny and Chromosomal Evolution of Alcelaphini (Antilopinae). Journal of Heredity. 105(3). 324–333. 8 indexed citations
4.
Charter, S.J., et al.. (2012). Detection of Embryonic Gonadal Stem Cells Following Short-Term Culture Using Flow Cytometry and Cell-Transfer.. Biology of Reproduction. 87(Suppl_1). 51–51. 2 indexed citations
5.
Gomes, Nuno, Oliver A. Ryder, Marlys L. Houck, et al.. (2011). Comparative biology of mammalian telomeres: hypotheses on ancestral states and the roles of telomeres in longevity determination. Aging Cell. 10(5). 761–768. 342 indexed citations
6.
Hekkala, Evon, Matthew H. Shirley, George Amato, et al.. (2011). An ancient icon reveals new mysteries: mummy DNA resurrects a cryptic species within the Nile crocodile. Molecular Ecology. 20(20). 4199–4215. 124 indexed citations
7.
Ben‐Nun, Inbar Friedrich, Marlys L. Houck, Ha Thi Thanh Tran, et al.. (2011). Induced pluripotent stem cells from highly endangered species. Nature Methods. 8(10). 829–831. 137 indexed citations
8.
Kumamoto, A.T., et al.. (2000). Chromosomes of the antelope genus <i>Kobus</i> (Artiodactyla, Bovidae): karyotypic divergence by centric fusion rearrangements. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 91(1-4). 128–133. 9 indexed citations
9.
Kumamoto, A.T., et al.. (1999). Centric fusion differences among <i>Oryx dammah, O. gazella,</i> and <i>O. leucoryx</i> (Artiodactyla, Bovidae). Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 86(1). 74–80. 17 indexed citations
10.
Kumamoto, A.T., et al.. (1998). Cryptic chromosomal variation in suni Neotragus moschatus (Artiodactyla, Bovidae). Animal Conservation. 1(2). 95–100. 9 indexed citations
11.
Kumamoto, A.T., et al.. (1996). Chromosomes ofDamaliscus (Artiodactyla, Bovidae): Simple and complex centric fusion rearrangements. Chromosome Research. 4(8). 614–621. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026