Simon Procter

492 citations
15 papers · 227 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Music top 2%
    • Diverse Music Education Insights
    • Art Therapy and Mental Health

Papers in

Simon Procter

15 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers

Simon Procter
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Music 65
  • Conservation 28
  • Social Psychology 155
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 94
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 31
Replace Inge Nygaard Pedersen with:
Inge Nygaard Pedersen Denmark
Jos De Backer Belgium
Laurien Hakvoort Netherlands
Karette Stensæth United Kingdom
John Carpente United States
Gro Trondalen Norway
Sarah Hodkinson United Kingdom
Nicola J. Holt United Kingdom
Liliana S. Araújo United Kingdom
R. S. Moore United States
Simon Procter relative to Inge Nygaard Pedersen Denmark Inge Nygaard Pedersen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Inge Nygaard Pedersen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Procter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Procter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Procter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Procter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Procter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Procter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Procter. The network helps show where Simon Procter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simon Procter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Procter Line = papers co-authored together Simon Procter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2006111
2 201141
3 201014
4 20199
5 19997
6 20197
7 20016
8 20056
9 20086
10 20214
11 20204
12 20123
13 20023
14 20213
15
Playing with Distinction? Music Therapy and the Affordances of Improvisation
20163

About Simon Procter

Simon Procter is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Music, Cognitive Neuroscience, Biochemistry and Clinical Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 227 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Therapy and Health (8 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (6 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers), Blood transfusion and management (2 papers), Blood donation and transfusion practices (1 paper) and Child Therapy and Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (65 citations), Conservation (28 citations), Social Psychology (155 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (94 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (31 citations). Simon Procter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ula Nur, Orii McDermott, Mike Crawford, Anna Maratos, Gary Ansdell, Jane W. Davidson, Wendy L. Magee, Rebecca Cardigan, Deborah Parker and Phil Mellor. Their work appears in journals such as Transfusion, Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Transfusion Medicine and Voices A World Forum for Music Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact