Agnes Wong
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Neurology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Herbert C. GoltzEwa Niechwiej‐SzwedoManokaraananthan ChandrakumarLinda ColpaJames SharpeLawrence TychsenMichael RichardsAndreas Burkhalter
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (52 papers)Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (39 papers)Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (38 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Agnes Wong
123 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
- Epidemiology 891
- Ophthalmology 601
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 500
- Neurology 398
Countries citing papers authored by Agnes Wong
This map shows the geographic impact of Agnes Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Agnes Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agnes Wong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Agnes Wong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Agnes Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Agnes Wong. The network helps show where Agnes Wong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Agnes Wong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Agnes Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Agnes Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Agnes Wong. Agnes Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 44 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 60 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | A New Method For Testing Letter Contrast Sensitivity In A Clinical Setting: Comparing M&S Smart System II Letter Contrast Test With Pelli-robson Chart | 1 |
| 14 | Effects of Earth-Fixed vs Head-Fixed Target on Ocular Counterroll | 1 |
| 15 | Early vs. Delayed Surgery for Infantile Esotropia in Human Infants: Effects on Cortical Visual Motion Processing | 1 |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Agnes Wong
Agnes Wong is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 124 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (52 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (39 papers) and Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (38 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (601 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations) and Neurology (398 citations). Agnes Wong has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Herbert C. Goltz, Ewa Niechwiej‐Szwedo, Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar, Linda Colpa, James Sharpe, Lawrence Tychsen, Michael Richards, Andreas Burkhalter, Paul Foeller and Douglas Tweed. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Neurology and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.