Simon C. Estók

826 citations
67 papers · 356 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Simon C. Estók

54 papers receiving 226 citations

Peers

Simon C. Estók
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Literature and Literary Theory 243
  • Geography, Planning and Development 118
  • Cultural Studies 72
  • Philosophy 54
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 44
Replace Serpil Oppermann with:
Serpil Oppermann Türkiye
Kyle Bladow United States
Serenella Iovino Italy
Joni Adamson United States
Alexa Weik von Mossner Austria
Dana Phillips United States
Terry Gifford United Kingdom
Nicole Seymour United States
Catriona Mortimer-Sandilands Canada
Anne D. Wallace United States
Simon C. Estók relative to Serpil Oppermann Türkiye Serpil Oppermann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Serpil Oppermann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon C. Estók

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon C. Estók's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon C. Estók with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon C. Estók more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon C. Estók

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon C. Estók. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon C. Estók. The network helps show where Simon C. Estók may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Simon C. Estók, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon C. Estók Line = papers co-authored together Simon C. Estók links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200991
2 201332
3 200124
4 201123
5 201122
6 201319
7 20159
8 20059
9 20108
10
East Asian ecocriticisms : a critical reader
20137
11 20057
12 20126
13 20196
14 20136
15 20235
16 20055
17 20195
18
Theory from the Fringes: Animals, Ecocriticism, Shakespeare
20074
19 20134
20 20244

About Simon C. Estók

Simon C. Estók is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Geography, Planning and Development, Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies and Philosophy, having authored 67 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (33 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (13 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (7 papers), Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (4 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers), Modern American Literature Studies (3 papers) and COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (243 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (118 citations), Cultural Studies (72 citations), Philosophy (54 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (44 citations). Simon C. Estók has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Serpil Oppermann, Greta Gaard and S. Krupakar Murali. Their work appears in journals such as ISLE Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, CLCWeb Comparative Literature and Culture, ANQ A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles Notes and Reviews, Kritika Kultura and Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact