Silke van Dyk
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Demography top 5%
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Co-authors
- Stephan LessenichTina DenningerAnna RichterMartin Seeleib‐KaiserStefanie GraefeEmma DowlingFabian KesslAlexander Ziem
- Topics
- Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (10 papers)Social Policy and Reform Studies (10 papers)Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaTheory Culture & SocietyWork Employment and Society
In The Last Decade
Silke van Dyk
44 papers receiving 445 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Sociology and Political Science 221
- General Health Professions 141
- Demography 141
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 125
- Political Science and International Relations 109
Countries citing papers authored by Silke van Dyk
This map shows the geographic impact of Silke van Dyk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Silke van Dyk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Silke van Dyk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Silke van Dyk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Silke van Dyk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Silke van Dyk. The network helps show where Silke van Dyk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Silke van Dyk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Silke van Dyk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Silke van Dyk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Silke van Dyk. Silke van Dyk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | Die DGS und der Nationalsozialismus | 0 |
| 9 | Projektförmige Polis und akademische Prekarität im universitären Feudalsystem | 2 |
| 10 | 46 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 86 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 58 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | Party politics and social welfare : comparing Christian and social democracy in Austria, Germany and the Netherlands | 16 |
About Silke van Dyk
Silke van Dyk is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Public Administration and Demography, having authored 50 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (10 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (10 papers) and Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (125 citations), Demography (141 citations) and Public Administration (28 citations). Silke van Dyk has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Mauritius and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Stephan Lessenich, Tina Denninger, Anna Richter, Martin Seeleib‐Kaiser, Stefanie Graefe, Emma Dowling, Fabian Kessl, Alexander Ziem, Daniel Wrana and Felicitas Macgilchrist. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Theory Culture & Society and Work Employment and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.