Shu‐Miaw Chaw

5.6k citations
62 papers · 3.9k indexed · h-index 31

Shu‐Miaw Chaw

61 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Shu‐Miaw Chaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.1k
  • Molecular Biology 2.7k
  • Plant Science 1.3k
  • Horticulture 25
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 216
Replace Kenneth J. Wurdack with:
Kenneth J. Wurdack United States
Lynn Bohs United States
Patrick A. Reeves United States
Andrea D. Wolfe United States
Cássio van den Berg Brazil
Freek T. Bakker Netherlands
Ze‐Long Nie China
Seung‐Chul Kim South Korea
Qiu‐Yun Xiang United States
Samuel F. Brockington United Kingdom
Shu‐Miaw Chaw relative to Kenneth J. Wurdack United States Kenneth J. Wurdack's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kenneth J. Wurdack · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shu‐Miaw Chaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shu‐Miaw Chaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shu‐Miaw Chaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shu‐Miaw Chaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shu‐Miaw Chaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shu‐Miaw Chaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shu‐Miaw Chaw. The network helps show where Shu‐Miaw Chaw may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shu‐Miaw Chaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shu‐Miaw Chaw Line = papers co-authored together Shu‐Miaw Chaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20244
2 20240
3 20217
4 202066
5 201967
6 201738
7 201567
8 201417
9
Phylogeny of Calocedrus (Cupressaceae), an Eastern Asian and Western North American Disjunct Gymnosperm Genus, Inferred from Nuclear Ribosomal nrITS Sequences
200923
10 2007116
11 2005252
12 200579
13 200467
14 200356
15 200128
16 200080
17 19982
18 1997240
19
Osteomeles schwerinae C. K. Schneid. (Rosaceae): a new record for the flora of Taiwan
19964
20 199542

About Shu‐Miaw Chaw

Shu‐Miaw Chaw is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Horticulture and Molecular Biology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (28 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (28 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (26 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (9 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (5 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.1k citations), Molecular Biology (2.7k citations) and Plant Science (1.3k citations). Shu‐Miaw Chaw has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Chung‐Shien Wu, Wen‐Hsiung Li, Ching-Ping Lin, Yuchang Cheng, Hsin‐Liang Chen, Christopher L. Parkinson, Thomas M. Vincent, Jeffrey D. Palmer, Yanan Wang and Andrey Zharkikh. Their work appears in journals such as Genome Biology and Evolution, Molecular Biology and Evolution, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Scientific Reports and Journal of Molecular Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026