Ching-Ping Lin

841 total citations
11 papers, 650 citations indexed

About

Ching-Ping Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Ching-Ping Lin has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 650 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 5 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Ching-Ping Lin's work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (6 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (4 papers) and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (3 papers). Ching-Ping Lin is often cited by papers focused on Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (6 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (4 papers) and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (3 papers). Ching-Ping Lin collaborates with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Ching-Ping Lin's co-authors include Shu‐Miaw Chaw, Chung‐Shien Wu, Yanan Wang, Jen‐Pan Huang, Yuting Lai, Ya‐Yi Huang, Ruijiang Wang, Roland Schafleitner, Ching-I Kuo and Chien‐Yu Chen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Plant and Soil.

In The Last Decade

Ching-Ping Lin

11 papers receiving 639 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ching-Ping Lin Taiwan 8 517 312 179 117 75 11 650
Ruisen Lu China 13 401 0.8× 229 0.7× 227 1.3× 218 1.9× 79 1.1× 42 656
Changkyun Kim South Korea 18 427 0.8× 435 1.4× 276 1.5× 153 1.3× 83 1.1× 49 726
Caifei Zhang China 12 424 0.8× 355 1.1× 233 1.3× 108 0.9× 32 0.4× 25 607
Peng‐Cheng Fu China 15 379 0.7× 252 0.8× 152 0.8× 183 1.6× 42 0.6× 42 529
Kelly P. Steele United States 9 500 1.0× 493 1.6× 333 1.9× 125 1.1× 60 0.8× 11 778
Jun‐Bo Yang China 6 391 0.8× 261 0.8× 121 0.7× 96 0.8× 65 0.9× 8 478
Hyosig Won South Korea 10 369 0.7× 341 1.1× 230 1.3× 86 0.7× 33 0.4× 32 552
Mao-Lun Weng Saudi Arabia 10 605 1.2× 364 1.2× 227 1.3× 108 0.9× 47 0.6× 11 684
M. Möller United Kingdom 15 585 1.1× 561 1.8× 411 2.3× 188 1.6× 58 0.8× 43 828

Countries citing papers authored by Ching-Ping Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching-Ping Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching-Ping Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching-Ping Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching-Ping Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching-Ping Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching-Ping Lin. The network helps show where Ching-Ping Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ching-Ping Lin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ching-Ping Lin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ching-Ping Lin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ching-Ping Lin. Ching-Ping Lin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Lin, Ching-Ping, et al.. (2019). The complete chloroplast genome of agarwood producing species, Aquilaria sinensis (Lour.) Gilg: a species on IUCN red list. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(2). 2992–2993. 3 indexed citations
2.
Lin, Ching-Ping, et al.. (2019). The complete mitochondrial genome of wild mung bean (Vigna radiata var. sublobata TC1966). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(2). 3016–3017. 1 indexed citations
3.
Kuo, Tony, Kuanyi Li, Ching-Ping Lin, et al.. (2016). Genomic and transcriptomic comparison of nucleotide variations for insights into bruchid resistance of mungbean (Vigna radiata [L.] R. Wilczek). BMC Plant Biology. 16(1). 46–46. 28 indexed citations
5.
Lin, Ching-Ping, et al.. (2015). The complete mitochondrial genome of mungbean Vigna radiata var. radiata NM92 and a phylogenetic analysis of crops in angiosperms. Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 27(5). 3731–3732. 4 indexed citations
6.
Lin, Ching-Ping, Chung‐Shien Wu, Ya‐Yi Huang, & Shu‐Miaw Chaw. (2012). The Complete Chloroplast Genome of Ginkgo biloba Reveals the Mechanism of Inverted Repeat Contraction. Genome Biology and Evolution. 4(3). 374–381. 81 indexed citations
8.
Wu, Chung‐Shien, et al.. (2011). Comparative Chloroplast Genomes of Pinaceae: Insights into the Mechanism of Diversified Genomic Organizations. Genome Biology and Evolution. 3. 309–319. 91 indexed citations
9.
Lin, Yu-Te, Ching-Ping Lin, Shu‐Miaw Chaw, et al.. (2010). Bacterial community of very wet and acidic subalpine forest and fire-induced grassland soils. Plant and Soil. 332(1-2). 417–427. 12 indexed citations
10.
Lin, Ching-Ping, et al.. (2010). Comparative Chloroplast Genomics Reveals the Evolution of Pinaceae Genera and Subfamilies. Genome Biology and Evolution. 2. 504–517. 146 indexed citations
11.
Wu, Chung‐Shien, Yuting Lai, Ching-Ping Lin, Yanan Wang, & Shu‐Miaw Chaw. (2009). Evolution of reduced and compact chloroplast genomes (cpDNAs) in gnetophytes: Selection toward a lower-cost strategy. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 52(1). 115–124. 132 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026