Sholeen Nett
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 2%
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Vinay NadkarniAkira NishisakiJan Hau LeeDavid TurnerJustine ShultsPradip KamatJanet JarvisGuillaume Émériaud
- Topics
- Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (7 papers)Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (7 papers)Tracheal and airway disorders (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineEmergency MedicineCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingaporeCanada
In The Last Decade
Sholeen Nett
20 papers receiving 328 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 188
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 164
- Emergency Medicine 119
- Epidemiology 49
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 38
Countries citing papers authored by Sholeen Nett
This map shows the geographic impact of Sholeen Nett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sholeen Nett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sholeen Nett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sholeen Nett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sholeen Nett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sholeen Nett. The network helps show where Sholeen Nett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sholeen Nett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sholeen Nett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sholeen Nett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sholeen Nett. Sholeen Nett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 49 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 88 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About Sholeen Nett
Sholeen Nett is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (7 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (7 papers) and Tracheal and airway disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (164 citations), Emergency Medicine (119 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (38 citations). Sholeen Nett has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Vinay Nadkarni, Akira Nishisaki, Jan Hau Lee, David Turner, Justine Shults, Pradip Kamat, Janet Jarvis, Akira Nishisaki, Guillaume Émériaud and Vicki Montgomery. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Critical Care Medicine and Critical Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.