Shirley Cheng
- Co-authors
- Daniel LevyDaniel LévyJ. K. ThomasCharles F. KulpaWilliam S. BlanerJean C. ShihGypsyamber DʼSouzaVolkmar Weissig
- Topics
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (6 papers)Cancer Cells and Metastasis (5 papers)Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Shirley Cheng
29 papers receiving 373 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Molecular Biology 196
- Oncology 72
- Surgery 44
- Epidemiology 44
- Physiology 43
Countries citing papers authored by Shirley Cheng
This map shows the geographic impact of Shirley Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shirley Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shirley Cheng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shirley Cheng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shirley Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shirley Cheng. The network helps show where Shirley Cheng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shirley Cheng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shirley Cheng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shirley Cheng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shirley Cheng. Shirley Cheng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Structure and function analysis in circulating tumor cells: using nanotechnology to study nuclear size in prostate cancer. | 5 |
| 13 | Circulating tumor cells in prostate cancer: beyond enumeration. | 9 |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | [The protective effects of metallothionein on membrane proteins against endothelin--electron paramagnetic resonance spin labelling study]. | 1 |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 52 | |
| 20 | 41 |
About Shirley Cheng
Shirley Cheng is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Cancer Research and Oncology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (6 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (5 papers) and Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (41 citations), Biochemistry (35 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (28 citations). Shirley Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Levy, Daniel Lévy, J. K. Thomas, Charles F. Kulpa, William S. Blaner, Jean C. Shih, Gypsyamber DʼSouza, Volkmar Weissig, Yuan Wang and Du You-Wei. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.