Shibu K. Mathew

47 papers receiving 581 citations

Peers

Shibu K. Mathew
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 568
  • Artificial Intelligence 206
  • Molecular Biology 86
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 42
  • Oceanography 41
Replace Yongyuan Xiang with:
Yongyuan Xiang China
M. Sobotka Czechia
T. L. Riethmüller Germany
K. G. Puschmann Germany
Eunsu Park South Korea
Xiaoli Yan China
Sanjiv K. Tiwari United States
Il‐Hyun Cho South Korea
L. J. November United States
V. Zakharov Germany
Shibu K. Mathew relative to Yongyuan Xiang China Yongyuan Xiang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Yongyuan Xiang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shibu K. Mathew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shibu K. Mathew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shibu K. Mathew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shibu K. Mathew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shibu K. Mathew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shibu K. Mathew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shibu K. Mathew. The network helps show where Shibu K. Mathew may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shibu K. Mathew

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shibu K. Mathew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shibu K. Mathew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shibu K. Mathew. Shibu K. Mathew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 2
3 3
4 3
5
Narrow-Band Imaging System for the Multi-application Solar Telescope at Udaipur Solar Observatory: Characterization of Lithium Niobate Etalons
9
6 7
7 2
8 8
9 2
10 31
11 7
12 2
13
Space Qualification of a Thin Wafer Lithium Niobate Etalon for the Visible Light Imager and Magnetograph (VIM)
1
14 65
15 56
16 4
17 47
18 55
19 63
20
A Comparison of Flux Emergence, Cancellation, and Motions in Flaring and Non-Flaring Sites of NOAA 8038 Observed by USO Magnetograph
1

About Shibu K. Mathew

Shibu K. Mathew is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 51 papers that have together received 613 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (43 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (21 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (568 citations), Artificial Intelligence (206 citations) and Oceanography (41 citations). Shibu K. Mathew has collaborated with scholars based in India, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include S. K. Solanki, N. A. Krivova, Rohan E. Louis, J. M. Borrero, A. Lagg, P. Venkatakrishnan, L. R. Bellot Rubio, Nandita Srivastava, V. Martı́nez Pillet and M. Collados. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026