Shen Tu

681 total citations
48 papers, 543 citations indexed

About

Shen Tu is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Shen Tu has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 543 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 18 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 11 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Shen Tu's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (28 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (8 papers). Shen Tu is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (28 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (8 papers). Shen Tu collaborates with scholars based in China, United States and Germany. Shen Tu's co-authors include Jiang Qiu, Qinglin Zhang, Dongtao Wei, Ting Wang, Jerwen Jou, Ulla Martens, Caiyun Yu, Hong Li, Guang Zhao and Huazhan Yin and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.

In The Last Decade

Shen Tu

44 papers receiving 534 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Shen Tu China	14	372	217	153	59	46	48	543
Anjali Raja Beharelle Switzerland	11	347 0.9×	128 0.6×	91 0.6×	31 0.5×	98 2.1×	13	539
Jianqiao Ge China	13	385 1.0×	116 0.5×	167 1.1×	43 0.7×	77 1.7×	26	584
Megan Willis Australia	12	437 1.2×	250 1.2×	109 0.7×	64 1.1×	33 0.7×	30	606
Chad E. Forbes United States	9	276 0.7×	118 0.5×	145 0.9×	60 1.0×	16 0.3×	15	474
Rosa Steimke Germany	10	369 1.0×	140 0.6×	65 0.4×	126 2.1×	36 0.8×	10	509
Glyn Hallam United Kingdom	11	741 2.0×	200 0.9×	159 1.0×	44 0.7×	125 2.7×	22	872
Mark A. Straccia United States	6	367 1.0×	94 0.4×	94 0.6×	38 0.6×	48 1.0×	6	499
Amy Winecoff United States	7	279 0.8×	147 0.7×	129 0.8×	66 1.1×	37 0.8×	12	452
Hongwen Song China	11	209 0.6×	119 0.5×	77 0.5×	71 1.2×	30 0.7×	27	434

Countries citing papers authored by Shen Tu

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shen Tu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shen Tu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shen Tu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shen Tu

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shen Tu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shen Tu. The network helps show where Shen Tu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shen Tu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shen Tu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shen Tu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shen Tu. Shen Tu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Liu, Zhen, et al.. (2025). When robot knocks, knowledge locks: how and when does AI awareness affect employee knowledge hiding?. Frontiers in Psychology. 16. 1627999–1627999. 1 indexed citations

Liu, Qingying, et al.. (2024). Unconscious Integration of Categorical Relationship of Two Subliminal Numbers in Comparison with “5”. Behavioral Sciences. 14(4). 296–296.

Liu, Chengzhen, et al.. (2023). Does unconscious processing benefit creative problem-solving, especially when people have been misdirected?. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 49. 101365–101365. 5 indexed citations

Liu, Chengzhen, et al.. (2023). The Unconscious Tug-of-War: Exploring the Effect of Stimulus Selection Bias on Creative Problem Solving with Multiple Unconscious Stimuli. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. Volume 16. 3987–4002.

Zhao, Guang, et al.. (2021). Contextual Cueing Accelerated and Enhanced by Monetary Reward: Evidence From Event-Related Brain Potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 15. 623931–623931. 1 indexed citations

Tu, Shen, et al.. (2019). Automatic Inattention to Attractive Alternative Partners Helps Male Heterosexual Chinese College Students Maintain Romantic Relationships. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 1687–1687. 6 indexed citations

Liu, Chengzhen, Jerwen Jou, Qian Cui, et al.. (2016). Unconscious Processing of Facial Emotional Valence Relation: Behavioral Evidence of Integration between Subliminally Perceived Stimuli. PLoS ONE. 11(9). e0162689–e0162689. 15 indexed citations

Zhao, Guang, et al.. (2015). Attentional Biases toward Attractive Alternatives and Rivals: Mechanisms Involved in Relationship Maintenance among Chinese Women. PLoS ONE. 10(8). e0136662–e0136662. 9 indexed citations

Tu, Shen. (2014). A Way of Integration: The Relationship between Conscious and Unconscious Processes. Advances in Psychology. 4(3). 473–484. 5 indexed citations

10.

Tu, Shen, Ulla Martens, Guang Zhao, et al.. (2013). Subliminal faces with different valence: Unconscious mismatch detection indicates interactions between unconscious processing. World Journal of Neuroscience. 3(4). 298–306. 9 indexed citations

11.

Li, Wei, Jiang Qiu, Jerwen Jou, et al.. (2011). Neural mechanisms of subliminal priming for traumatic episodic memory: An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters. 498(1). 10–14. 23 indexed citations

12.

Wang, Ting, et al.. (2011). The effect of different negative emotional context on involuntary attention: An ERP study. Brain Research Bulletin. 86(1-2). 106–109. 10 indexed citations

13.

Wang, Ting, et al.. (2010). The electrophysiological effect of working memory load on involuntary attention in an auditory–visual distraction paradigm: an ERP study. Experimental Brain Research. 205(1). 81–86. 31 indexed citations

14.

Zhao, Yufang, Shen Tu, Ming Lei, et al.. (2010). The neural basis of breaking mental set: an event-related potential study. Experimental Brain Research. 208(2). 181–187. 19 indexed citations

15.

Tu, Shen, et al.. (2010). Neural correlates of mental preparation for successful insight problem solving. Behavioural Brain Research. 216(2). 626–630. 39 indexed citations

16.

Qiu, Jiang, Hong Li, Qinglin Zhang, et al.. (2009). Electrophysiological evidence of personal experiences in the great Sichuan earthquake impacting on selective attention. Science in China Series C Life Sciences. 52(7). 683–690. 6 indexed citations

17.

Qiu, Jiang, Hong Li, Yuejia Luo, Qinglin Zhang, & Shen Tu. (2009). The neural basis of syllogistic reasoning: An event-related potential study. Brain Research. 1273. 106–113. 7 indexed citations

18.

Qiu, Jiang, Caiyun Yu, Hong Li, et al.. (2009). The impact of social comparison on the neural substrates of reward processing: An event-related potential study. NeuroImage. 49(1). 956–962. 35 indexed citations

19.

Tu, Shen, Hong Li, Jerwen Jou, et al.. (2008). An event-related potential study of deception to self preferences. Brain Research. 1247. 142–148. 17 indexed citations

20.

Wang, Ting, Qinglin Zhang, Hong Li, et al.. (2008). The time course of Chinese riddles solving: Evidence from an ERP study. Behavioural Brain Research. 199(2). 278–282. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact